Paris : $b or, the future of warLiddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Science
Paris : $b or, the future of war
Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Military art and science; War
No more terrible portent for the future exists than the fact that the
militarist nations are awaking to the _destructive_ possibilities of
the new weapons, while the Anglo-Saxon peoples, who are the leaders
of _constructive_ human progress, and hence might be expected to take
longer views, refuse to think or talk about the subject, either from
war-weariness or natural antipathy to war. Like the legendary ostrich
burying its head in the sand, they seemingly hope to escape the danger
by shutting it out of sight.
Absorbed in building the Temple of Peace, they neglect to take into
account the stresses and strains the edifice may have to bear――and
then, as before in history, are surprised when their plaster and stucco
temple collapses under the rude blast of international storms.
Of these two new weapons, air supremacy is possessed by France,
chemical resources by Germany. A significant fact is that France
lacks the foundations on which to build up a great chemical plant,
whereas Germany, in her rapidly developing civil aviation, has a
potential instrument whereby to employ her chemical weapons, with
relatively slight adaptation. Thus it may not be inapt to quote
the views of a high German authority, General von Altrock, in the
_Militar-Wochenblatt_: “In wars of the future the initial hostile
attacks will be decided against the great nerve and communication
centres of the enemy’s territory, against its large cities, factory
centres, munition areas, water, gas, and light supplies; in fact,
against every life artery of the country. Discharge of poisonous
gases will become the rule since great progress has been made in the
production of poison gas. Such attacks will be carried to great depths
in rear of the actual fighting troops. Entire regions inhabited by
peaceful population will be continually threatened with extinction. The
war will frequently have the appearance of a destruction _en masse_ of
the entire civil population rather than a combat of armed men.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account