Paris : $b or, the future of warLiddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Science
Paris : $b or, the future of war
Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Military art and science; War
Glance for a moment at a map of Europe――it will be seen that Great
Britain lies like a huge breakwater across the sea approaches to
Northern Europe, with Ireland as a smaller breakwater across the
approaches to Great Britain. We realize that in the Great War, Germany
was in the most unfavourable position possible for blockading England’s
sea communications, her submarines having first to get outside this
breakwater through a narrow outlet sown with mines and closely watched,
and on completion of this mission make the same hazardous return to
their bases. No stronger proof of the potential menace of the submarine
in future war can be found than that Germany, with so few submarines
and despite such an immense handicap, sank 8,500,000 tons of shipping,
and all but stopped the beat of Britain’s heart.
Contrast with this the geographical position of France, the chief
submarine power of the immediate future. Her Atlantic bases lie
directly opposite the sea approaches to the British Isles――in an ideal
position for submarine action to block the sea arteries on which
England’s life depends. Of potential significance also is the position
of Ireland, an outer breakwater lying across the gateways to Great
Britain, for should Ireland ever lend its harbours to an enemy as
submarine bases, the odds would be hopeless.
Turn again to the Mediterranean, another long and narrow sea channel
through which runs our artery with the East, and where our main naval
force is now concentrated. Note that our ships, naval or mercantile,
must traverse the _length_ of this channel, and worse still, have to
filter through a tiny hole at each end――the straits of Gibraltar and
the Suez Canal――while midway there is a narrow “waist” between Sicily
and Tunis, barely ninety miles across.
Then look at the geographical position of Toulon and of the French
naval ports on the North African coast, and note how the _radii_
of submarine attack intersect the long single line of British
sea communication. Is it not obvious that if in a future war any
Mediterranean power was numbered among Britain’s enemies, her fleet
would find it difficult enough to protect itself against submarines,
let alone protect merchant convoys and troop transports? When to the
proved menace of submarine power is added the potential effect of
aircraft attack against shipping in the narrow seas, it is time the
British people awoke to the fact that, in case of such a war, the
Mediterranean would be impassable, and that this important artery
would have to be abandoned. Thus, as a strategical asset, the Suez
Canal has lost a large part of its value in face of modern naval and
air development――for in such a war we should be driven to close the
Mediterranean route, and divert our imperial communications round the
Cape of Good Hope.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account