Paris : $b or, the future of warLiddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Science
Paris : $b or, the future of war
Liddell Hart, Basil Henry, Sir
Military art and science; War
Nor can it do any harm for our politicians and people to realize the
unquestionable if unpalatable fact that the existence of this country
is dependent on the good-will of France, the supreme air and submarine
power commanding both the vital centres of England and our oversea
communications at their most vulnerable points――that “Paris” is able to
shoot at our Achilles’ heel, and has “two strings to its bow” for the
purpose.
THE ARMY WEAPON
Finally, what is the future of this alternative “punch” to the air
attack? No future, assuredly, unless the army limb of the body military
is thoroughly overhauled and inoculated with the serum of mobility,
for the present type of army is suffering from chronic rheumatoid
arthritis, its joints far too stiff to deliver an effective punch.
The outstanding lesson of the Great War was the powerlessness of the
high commands to attain decisive successes――a condition due to three
main factors. First, the unwieldy masses put into the field allowed
neither opportunity nor room for manœuvre; second, these slow-moving
infantry masses were too vulnerable a target to modern fire-weapons;
third, their numbers imposed so great a strain on the means of supply
that offensive after offensive was stultified by the breakdown of
communications――the commanders of the Great War were as unhappily
placed as the proverbial puppy with a tin can attached to its tail.
The years 1914–18 show the “Nation in Arms” theory carried to its
climax; numbers of troops and quantity of _material_ had been the
ruling ideas of the General Staffs of Europe for half a century. What
was the upshot? That generalship became the slave of the monster it
had created. The artist of war yielded place to the artisan, because
we forgot the text preached by Marshal Saxe two centuries before,
that “multitudes serve only to perplex and embarrass.” Watching it
from across the Styx, Marshal Saxe can be imagined as uttering that
favourite quotation of his: “War is a trade for the ignorant, a
science for men of genius.”
What are the obvious deductions from the three factors we have
mentioned?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account