Verlaine, Paul, 1844-1896 -- Criticism and interpretation
He has also been called a great draftsman. It is true that an excellent
and characteristic skill in the figures and scribblings which he
sprinkled throughout his letters cannot be gainsaid. There is even a
pathetic element in their self-confessed technical imperfections. The
caricatures are playful, without malicious or serious intent, jotted
down with childish self-satisfaction, but, of course, they need not be
taken seriously. They are little marginalia to his life, and addenda to
the numerous sharp and bright sketches with which his intimate friend
and artistic Eckermann, F. A. Cazals, has fixed him for posterity.
They show Verlaine in all his moods--in his bonhomie, despair, grief,
"_gaminerie_," sexuality, disease, even to the last sketches which
show him in death. They form a gallery of his life from childhood to
childhood along the dark way of his destiny. And as in his poetry,
notwithstanding all the exuberant passages, the final impression is a
wailing note of sadness--the stroke of melancholy's bow.
POSTLUDE
The only thing which now remains is to ascertain whether Paul Verlaine's
life-work, beginning in Metz and ending in a small lodging-house room
in Paris on a January day in 1896, contains the elements which we would
call "lasting" because we are afraid of the proud and resounding word
"eternal." The significance of great poets passes the boundaries of
literature and ignores what is known as "influences" and "artistic
atmosphere." The eternal element of great works of poetry reaches back
toward eternity. For humanity poetry is infinity which it joins with the
ether, and the great poets are those who were able to help in
elaborating the wonderful bond which stretches from the distant darkness
to the red of the new dawn.
It does not diminish Verlaine's stature if we do not count him among
the heroes of life. He was an isolated phenomena, too significant to be
typical and too weak to become eternal. There was beauty in his pure
humanness, but not of the kind which remains permanent. He has given
nothing which was not already in us. He was a fleeting stream of life
passing by; he was the sublime echo of the mysterious music which rises
within us on every contact of things, like the ring of glasses on a
cupboard under every footstep and impact.
His effect is deep, but yet on that account not great. To have become
great it would have been necessary for him to conquer the destiny which
he could not master and to liberate his will from the thousand little
vices and passions which enwrapped it. He is one of the writers who
could be spared, whom nevertheless no one would do without. He is a
marvel, beautiful and unnecessary, like a rare flower which gives
sweetness and wonderful peace to the senses, but which does not make us
noble, strong, brave and humble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account