Civilization, Western -- Fiction; France -- Civilization -- Fiction; Penguins -- Fiction; Satire
Called to give his opinion, Pope St. Damascus expressed himself in
these terms:
“In order to know if a baptism is valid and will produce its result,
that is to say, sanctification, it is necessary to consider who gives
it and not who receives it. In truth, the sanctifying virtue of this
sacrament results from the exterior act by which it is conferred,
without the baptized person cooperating in his own sanctification by
any personal act; if it were otherwise it would not be administered to
the newly born. And there is no need, in order to baptize, to fulfil
any special condition; it is not necessary to be in a state of grace;
it is sufficient to have the intention of doing what the Church does,
to pronounce the consecrated words and to observe the prescribed forms.
Now we cannot doubt that the venerable Maël has observed these
conditions. Therefore the penguins are baptized.”
“Do you think so?” asked St. Guénolé. “And what then do you believe
that baptism really is? Baptism is the process of regeneration by which
man is born of water and of the spirit, for having entered the water
covered with crimes, he goes out of it a neophyte, a new creature,
abounding in the fruits of righteousness; baptism is the seed of
immortality; baptism is the pledge of the resurrection; baptism is the
burying with Christ in His death and participation in His departure
from the sepulchre. That is not a gift to bestow upon birds. Reverend
Fathers, let us consider. Baptism washes away original sin; now the
penguins were not conceived in sin. It removes the penalty of sin; now
the penguins have not sinned. It produces grace and the gift of
virtues, uniting Christians to Jesus Christ, as the members to the
body, and it is obvious to the senses that penguins cannot acquire the
virtues of confessors, of virgins, and of widows, or receive grace and
be united to—”
St. Damascus did not allow him to finish.
“That proves,” said he warmly, “that the baptism was useless; it does
not prove that it was not effective.”
“But by this reasoning,” said St. Guénolé, “one might baptize in the
name of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, by aspersion or
immersion, not only a bird or a quadruped, but also an inanimate
object, a statue, a table, a chair, etc. That animal would be
Christian, that idol, that table would be Christian! It is absurd!”
St. Augustine began to speak. There was a great silence.
“I am going,” said the ardent bishop of Hippo, “to show you, by an
example, the power of formulas. It deals, it is true, with a diabolical
operation. But if it be established that formulas taught by the Devil
have effect upon unintelligent animals or even on inanimate objects,
how can we longer doubt that the effect of the sacramental formulas
extends to the minds of beasts and even to inert matter?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account