Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo IIIAllies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Islamic
Peter's Rock in Mohammed's Flood, from St. Gregory the Great to St. Leo III
Allies, T. W. (Thomas William)
Christianity and other religions -- Islam; Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Papacy; Papacy -- History
“Christ has commanded pastors to be watchful: this concerns us also, and
especially must we watch over the purity of the faith, since certain
bishops, who do not deserve this name, have lately sought to spoil our
confession of belief by new invented expressions. Everyone knows them,
since they have come forward openly to injure the Church: such are Cyrus
of Alexandria, Sergius of Constantinople, and his followers, Pyrrhus and
Paulus. Cyrus eighteen years ago taught in Alexandria One Operation in
Christ, and published from the pulpit nine heads of doctrine. Sergius
approved this, issued somewhat later the Ecthesis under the name of the
emperor Heraclius, and taught One Will and One Operation, which leads to
One Nature of Christ. The Fathers distinctly taught that Operation answers
to Nature, and whoever has like Operation must likewise be of like Nature.
Since then the Fathers teach Two Natures in Christ, it follows that Two
Wills and Operations are united without mixture and without division in
one and the same Incarnate Word. That both are naturally one thing is not
possible. Pope Leo also taught Two Wills, and so holy Scripture indicates.
So Christ wrought what belonged to the Godhead corporeally, since He
manifested it through His flesh animated by a reasonable soul; but what
belonged to the Manhood, He wrought by the Godhead, since He took upon Him
freely for our sake human weaknesses, that is, sufferings, but without
sin. Cyrus, in issuing his nine heads of doctrine, Sergius, in issuing the
Ecthesis, contradicted the doctrine of Leo, and of the Council of
Chalcedon. But Pyrrhus and Paulus spread the error more widely; in
particular, Pyrrhus by threats and flatteries seduced many bishops to
subscribe his impiety. When he had afterwards come to shame, he came
hither and presented to our Holy See a writing in which he anathematised
his former error. But he returned as a dog to his vomit, and was therefore
rightly deposed. But Paulus went even beyond his predecessor; he confirmed
the Ecthesis, and contradicted the true doctrine.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account