Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world. — John Shaqi
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.Various
History
Philosophical transactions, Vol. L. Part I. For the year 1757.: Giving some account of the present undertakings, studies, and labours, of the ingenious, in many considerable parts of the world.
Various
Science -- Periodicals
It is worthy of remark, that, of the five great earthquakes, which
this country has felt since its settlement by the English, two have
gone nearly in the same track as this last did. The first, which was
on June 2. 1638, 'came from the northward, and passed southward.’ By
the description given of it, it was very much like our late earthquake,
only perhaps not quite so violent. 'The noise and shakes of the
earthquake, October 29. 1727, seemed,’ it is said, 'to come from the
north-westward, and to go off south-easterly; and so the houses seemed
to reel.’ As to the great earthquakes of 1658 and 1662, we have no
account of the courses, which they went in. But, from the other three,
it may be reasonably conjectured, that the source of our earthquakes,
or the place in which they originate, is in some part of Canada, or
perhaps beyond it.
The extent of this earthquake seems to have been greater than that of
any of our former earthquakes. This province of the Massachusetts-bay,
or rather the province of New Hampshire, about the latitude of 43°
north on the sea-coast, seems to have been the center of it, or the
place of its greatest violence, and the shake to have been less
considerable each way from hence towards the S. W. and N. E. By the
accounts we have from the S. W. the shock was less at New York than it
was with us; and still less at Philadelphia, which is farther towards
the S. W. By the best information I can procure, the limit toward the
S. W. was Chesopeak-bay in Maryland, the shock having been felt on
the eastern side of that bay, and not on the western. For the other
limit toward the N. E. we are informed, that the earthquake was felt
at Annapolis Royal in Nova Scotia, though in a much less degree than
with us. It shook off a few bricks from the tops of some chimnies, but
was not perceived by vessels on the water. And a letter from Halifax
says, 'The earthquake, which happened in the W. extended itself to this
place, tho’ scarcely perceivable here.’ But it was not at all felt by
our army, which lay encamped at Seganecto, about 100 miles N. from
Halifax. Thus Halifax seems to have been very near the N. E. limit.
I am not able to ascertain its eastern and western limits; but it
extended to all our back inland settlements; and was perceived, though
in a very small degree, by our army at Lake George, distant from hence
about 130 miles N. W. by W. But it was not felt at all at the British
fort of Oswego, situate on the south-eastern shore of Lake Ontario,
and distant from hence about 230 miles W. by N. So great was the shock
in the Atlantic, 70 leagues to the E. of Cape Anne, that the people on
board a vessel there were suddenly surprised, just at the time of our
earthquake, supposing they had run a-ground; till, on throwing over the
lead, they found they had more than 50 fathom water. The extent of the
earthquake E. and W. from Halifax to Lake George was about 550 miles;
and its extent along the sea-coast, from N.E. to S.W. at least 800
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account