The polar axis of the Crossley reflector is a long, hollow cylinder,
separated by a space of about one-eighth of an inch from its concentric
casing. The idea was to fill this space with mercury, and float the
greater part of the thrust of the axis, the function of a small steel pin
at the lower end being merely to steady the axis. But this mercury
flotation, as applied to the Crossley telescope, is a delusion, as I think
Mr. Crossley had already found. The mercury, it is true, relieves the
thrust to some extent, but it greatly increases the already enormous side
pressure on the steel pin at the bottom, thus creating a much greater evil
than the one it is intended to remedy. The workmen who set up the mounting
inform me that the small bearing at the lower end of the polar axis is
badly worn, as I should expect it to be. Instead of putting mercury into
the space intended for it, I have therefore poured in a pint or so of oil,
to keep the lower bearing lubricated. For the reasons indicated above, the
force required to move the telescope in right ascension is perhaps five
times greater than it should be. The lower end of the polar axis ought to
be fitted with ball bearings to take the thrust, and with a pair of
friction wheels on top; but it would be difficult to make these changes
now. It should be observed that the disadvantages of the mercury flotation
are considerably greater at Mount Hamilton than at the latitude for which
the telescope was designed.
[Illustration: THE CROSSLEY REFLECTOR.]
As already stated above, the range of the telescope is limited on the
south by the construction of the mounting. The greatest southern
declination which can be observed is 25°. In England this would doubtless
mark the limit set by atmospheric conditions, but at Mount Hamilton it
would be easy to photograph objects 15° farther south, if the telescope
could be pointed to them.
The original driving-clock having proved to be inefficient, at least
without an electric control, a new and powerful driving-clock was made by
the Observatory instrument maker, from designs by Professor Hussey. In its
general plan it is like that of the 36-inch refractor. The winding
apparatus, contained in the large casting of the original mounting, has no
maintaining power, and can not easily be fitted with one. The clock could
in no case be wound during a photographic exposure, on account of the
tremors attending the operation, but it would be somewhat more convenient
to have the stars remain on the plate during the winding. With a little
practice, however, one can wind the clock without actually stopping it,
though the object must afterwards be brought back to its place by means of
the slow motion in right ascension.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account