Phylogeny of the Waxwings and Allied BirdsArvey, M. Dale (Martin Dale)
Science
Phylogeny of the Waxwings and Allied Birds
Arvey, M. Dale (Martin Dale)
Bombycillidae -- Phylogeny; Waxwings -- Phylogeny
The oldest name available for any species of the waxwings is _Lanius
garrulus_ Linnaeus (1758). _Lanius garrulus_ and _Lanius garrulus_
variety B _carolinensis_ were described as conspecific. The
description has been associated with the first of the two names. The
latter name is a _nomen nudum_ since it was not accompanied by a
separate description. The generic name _Lanius_ was originally applied
to both shrikes and waxwings by Linnaeus. Since that name is applied
to the shrikes only, the next available generic name that may be
applied to the generically different waxwings must be used. This is
_Bombycilla_, a name originally proposed by Brisson (1760) for the
Cedar Waxwing. In the 12th Edition of the Systemae Naturae (1766)
Gmelin proposed the generic name _Ampelis_ for the Bohemian Waxwing,
and combined it with the specific name _garrulus_, the Cedar Waxwing
being termed variety B. Vieillot (1807) proposed the generic name
_Bombycilla_ and combined it with a new specific name, _cedrorum_, for
the Cedar Waxwing. Vieillot has been cited as the author of
_Bombycilla_ since that time, although Brisson used _Bombycilla_ 33
years before. Oberholser (1917) did not cite Brisson's work in his
discussion of the proper generic name for the waxwings, and
_Bombycilla_ should be ascribed to Brisson and not Vieillot, since
Opinion 37, rendered by the International Zoological Committee on
Nomenclature, states that generic names used by Brisson (1760) are
valid under the Code. In consequence, the specific name available for
the Cedar Waxwing, since Brisson is ruled not to be a binomialist, is
_Bombycilla cedrorum_ Vieillot (1807).
Most workers prior to 1900 utilized the family name Ampelidae to
include waxwings, silky flycatchers, and palm-chats. Ridgway
(1904:113) elevated the silky flycatchers to family rank under the
name Ptilogonatidae, and assigned the palm-chats to a separate family,
the Dulidae.
MATERIALS
The following specimens, numbering 238, and representing each
currently recognized species and subspecies, were used in the study,
and were supplemented by observation in 1947 on specimens in the
United States National Museum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account