Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
I. Phenomena, however wonderful, are not noted and admired
unless they are uncommon. The sun and moon and starry
heavens have no observers, but a Comet at once sets the
whole world agog. The nature of the stars is a sublime and
likewise a profitable study 271
II. The nature of _Comets_ has not been hitherto fully
investigated. They are so rare that one wants a record of
the movements of all ever observed 273
III. Democritus, Eudoxus, Conon, Epigenes, and Apollonius of
Myndus all fail to give any satisfactory account of the
matter. Nor had the Egyptians or Chaldaeans investigated
them 274
IV. Epigenes explains the Comet as due to a conjunction of
Saturn with Mars or the Sun: it is akin to whirlwind and
“beam” meteors 275
V. But there are essential differences between whirlwind, which
is terrestrial, and beams and torches, which are above the
clouds. There is a difference of duration also. Beams and
Comets, it is true, have been mistaken for one another. It
was a Comet, according to Aristotle, that appeared before
the destruction of Buris and Helice. The character of the
flame differs in the two forms 276
VI. There are two kinds of Comets, according to Epigenes. They
are produced by air driven up and setting on fire suitable
material above, which takes place every day at the same hour 277
VII. But Comets are not concomitants of winds; there is no
parallelism in the phenomena. The higher ones, which have an
orbit, he attributes to the north wind, but the facts do not
square here either 278
VIII. The course and altitude of Comets render the whirlwind
explanation impossible 279
IX. The force and duration of whirlwinds are similarly
inadequate 280
X. The slowness and steadiness of the Comet could not be
accounted for on this assumption, nor its general behaviour
and shape 281
XI. We must look for some other explanation. Now Comets, it must
be premised, appear in all quarters of the sky. Whatever the
divisions of them made by the Greeks, they are all of one
origin. Some of the ancients thought they were due to the
union of two planets 283
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account