Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
XII. Again the facts do not square. Comets and planets appear
simultaneously. A conjunction is momentary, a Comet lasts
six months sometimes. The planets do not pass much beyond
the ecliptic, but Comets appear in every quarter of the sky.
And there are other objections 284
XIII. Artemidorus thinks the firmament is solid and has
openings for stars. Comets are casual planets, or formed by
conjunctions of them. His account is a tissue of barefaced
falsehoods 286
XIV. How would a solid firmament be supported? No feasible
explanation can be offered. Besides, the number of stars is
so great--and they may all be “wanderers” if an indefinite
number is--that there must be innumerable conjunctions of
them, _i.e._ Comets. But, as a matter of fact, Comets are
rare 287
XV. Again the huge Comets of the times of Demetrius and Attalus
would require scores of planetary conjunctions to form them 288
XVI. Ephorus, a mere chronicler, who takes this view, has
nothing to support him. He tries, like others of his set, to
embellish his work by narrating marvels. Why did he not tell
us what the two stars were into which the Comet resolved
itself, as he alleges it did? 289
XVII. Apollonius of Myndus holds the Comet to be a true star
(planet) with an erratic course, visible only when it
approaches the lower part of its orbit. Different colours of
Comets 290
XVIII. But Comets do not wax and wane as they approach and
recede like planets. Nor do their orbits lie within the
ecliptic. Besides, we can see through a Comet but not
through a true star (planet) 291
XIX. Zeno the Stoic thinks the light of converging stars gives
the appearance of a longer star. Others hold modified forms
of the same opinion or analogous views 291
XX. Most of the Stoics hold Comets to be evanescent, and
attribute them to friction of the air. Various phenomena are
analogous 292
XXI. Their methods of accounting for varieties of orbits in
Comets 293
XXII. I do not agree with any School. Reasons 295
XXIII. Further arguments showing difference between fires and
Comets 295
XXIV. There may be many stars in the universe whose paths
have not been traced: Comets are such. No satisfactory
explanation has been given of the mind, but its existence is
not doubted 297
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account