Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of SenecaSeneca, Lucius Annaeus
Philosophy
Physical science in the time of Nero : $b being a translation of the Quaestiones naturales of Seneca
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus
Comets; Earthquakes; Meteorology -- Early works to 1800
The historical title, _Natural Questions_, is convenient, though,
without explanation, a little misleading. The nearest rendering of
the Latin form _Quaestiones Naturales_ is Physical Inquiries, or
Investigations in the Domain of Physics, or, as in the title, what we
should now call Physical Science. The terms Physics and Science had a
very different connotation in that age and in ours. Plutarch, almost
a younger contemporary of Seneca, gravely discusses in a work with a
similar title such questions as Why shepherds give their sheep salt,
Why horses’ hair is superior to mares’ for casting-lines, and even, Why
a dog runs after a stone rather than after the person who threw it!
The extent of such a title is determined pretty much by the range of
topics an author decides to include. In Seneca’s case, as it happens,
the branches chiefly dealt with are Astronomy and Meteorology, together
with certain portions of what may be designated as Physical Geography
including Seismology.
Science was in that day synonymous with Philosophy, or at any rate
Philosophy embraced all that could claim to be Science. Learning
was homogeneous; its subdivisions had not yet been separated or
differentiated.
The treatise was addressed in a quasi-epistolary form to Lucilius
Junior, procurator[9] of Sicily. Most of our knowledge of him is
derived from Seneca, who, besides the _Q.N._, addressed to him his
_Epistles_ and his tract on _Providence_. Lucilius seems to have been
a _protégé_ of Seneca, and rising from the ranks under his fostering
care and guidance, not only to have attained a position of influence,
but also to have achieved literary distinction. His philosophical
predilections were toward Epicureanism, but he was a man of high
principle and character, though not exempt from dangerous temptations
at various points in his career. His public labours had associated
him with Sicily, and the themes of his writings, chiefly poems as it
would appear, had been drawn from the same quarter. He is, not without
probability, supposed to have been the author of the anonymous didactic
poem _Aetna_, for long attributed to Virgil, a work which presents
many interesting parallelisms to the _Q.N._ both in its science and
its philosophy. Seneca’s Epistle lxxix. contains a special charge to
Lucilius, who was at the time making a circuit of his province, to
report the facts concerning Charybdis--Seneca knew all there was to
know about Scylla--and to investigate in detail the present condition
of Aetna. The letter goes on to banter Lucilius upon the inclusion of
Aetna in the poem on which he was engaged--no doubt the work referred
to in _Q.N._ 114, 142; cf. 167. The whole question is discussed
with full knowledge by Professor Robinson Ellis in the Introduction
(xxxvi-xlviii) to his edition of the _Aetna_, to which reference
should be made. For other allusions to Lucilius in Seneca see, besides
the _Q.N._, Epistles xix. xxvi. xxxiv. etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account