Physiological Researches on Life and DeathBichat, Xavier
Science
Physiological Researches on Life and Death
Bichat, Xavier
Death (Biology); Life (Biology)
[4] This division between vegetables and animals is far from being
so striking as is here supposed; these two classes of beings,
so different when we examine them in the individuals endowed
with a very complicated organization, approximate each other
in a remarkable degree, when we descend to those species whose
structure is most simple; it is even remarkable that the most
constant character which distinguishes one from the other, is not
found in the organs of animal life, but in those of vegetable or
organic life. The senses are one after the other found wanting;
for in an individual in whom we can discover no nervous system,
there is no more reason to suppose the existence of the sense of
touch as a sensation, than to suppose it in the sensitive plant,
the dionæa muscipula, and other similar plants; we see only action
and reaction. The motions of the arms of certain polypi no more
suppose volition than the motion of the root which follows a wet
sponge, or that of the branches which turn towards the light;
the only very constant character is the absence or presence of a
digestive cavity. To speak of an animal as a vegetable clothed with
an external apparatus of organs of relation, is a more brilliant
than profound view of the subject. Buisson, who, in his division
of the physiological phenomena, avoids this inaccuracy, has
himself fallen into error; he pretends that respiration belongs
exclusively to animals; and that thus the division of Bichat was
not only unfounded but also incomplete, since this function,
which is neither of vegetation nor of relation, could be ranked
under neither life. Buisson was not well informed; no doubt the
respiration of vegetables does not exhibit the most apparent
phenomena of the respiration of the mammalia, but every thing,
which essentially constitutes the function, is found in the one as
well as in the other; absorption of the atmospheric air, and the
formation and exhalation of a new gas; the rest is only accidental
and is not an appendage but in certain classes of animals. In some
reptiles, though we find a particular organ for respiration, this
organ is not indispensable; it may be removed, and the skin becomes
the only respiratory organ; and when finally we come to consider
animals with _tracheæ_, we see that the conformity becomes more and
more evident.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account