Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 2 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the warStephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
History
Pictorial history of the war for the Union, volume 2 (of 2) : $b A complete and reliable history of the war from its commencement to its close ... together with a complete chronological analysis of the war
Stephens, Ann S. (Ann Sophia)
United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
the Shenandoah river, had occasioned the recall of General McDowell, and
that the Army of the Potomac must proceed without reinforcements.
General McClellan has been bitterly censured for his alleged
slothfulness and hesitation, at this juncture; nor can it be denied that
his advance towards Richmond was made slowly and with extreme caution.
It must be remembered, however, that to march through sloughs of mire,
in the face of a powerful and well intrenched foe, is far less easy than
to advance on paper, and conquer enemies with printers’ ink. This is not
a partisan history—its design is simply to record facts and to do
justice. Subsequent events have shed much light upon General McClellan’s
Peninsular Campaign. That he had not over-estimated the power of the
rebel forces, was conclusively shown in the bloody and terrible seven
days’ battles. That he was obliged to deviate from his own chosen plan
is evident, and is not denied: yet that plan was the same which was
ultimately adopted by General Grant, in the final campaign of the war.
Richmond when finally taken, was approached from the east and south, and
not from the north. General McClellan may have been overcautious; but
his tactics were wise, and his patriotism stainless.
The following is the language of General McClellan’s Report, as to
several essential points: “The land movement obliged me to expose my
right in order to secure the junction; and as the order for General
McDowell’s march was soon countermanded, I incurred great risk, of which
the enemy finally took advantage, and frustrated the plan of my
campaign. Had General McDowell joined me by water, I could have
approached Richmond by the James, and thus avoided the delays and losses
incurred in bridging the Chickahominy, and would have had the army
massed in one body, instead of being necessarily divided by that
stream....
“In view of the peculiar character of the Chickahominy, and the
liability of its bottom land to sudden inundations, it became necessary
to construct between Bottom’s Bridge and Mechanicsville, eleven new
bridges, all new and difficult, with extensive by-way approaches.
“The entire army could, probably, have been thrown across the
Chickahominy immediately after our arrival, but this would have left no
force on the left bank to guard our communications or to protect our
right and rear. If the communication with our supply depot had been cut
by the enemy, with our army concentrated upon the right bank of the
Chickahominy, and the stage of water as it was for many days after our
arrival, the bridges carried away, and our means of transportation not
furnishing a single day’s supplies in advance, the troops must have gone
without rations, and the animals without forage, and the army would have
been paralyzed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account