A special account of the aboriginal rock carvings at the head of Bantry bay is furnished by R. Etheridge, jr. (_a_), as follows, the illustration referred to being presented here as Fig. 132: [Illustration: FIG. 132.--Petroglyphs at Bantry bay, Australia.] Of the numerous traces of aboriginal rock carvings to be seen on the shores of Port Jackson, none probably equal in extent or completeness of detail those on the heights at the head and on the eastern side of Bantry bay, Middle harbor, Australia. The table of sandstone over which the carvings are scattered measures 2 chains in one direction by 3 in the contrary, and has a gentle slope of 7 degrees to the southwest. The high road as now laid out passes over a portion of them. * * * The figures are represented in their present state in outline by a continuous indentation or groove from 1 to 1-1/2 inches broad by half an inch to 1 inch in depth. Some are single subjects scattered promiscuously over the surface; others form small groups, illustrating compound subjects, but all appear to have been executed about one and the same time. * * * An advance on the other sculptures existing at this place seems to be made in the originals of the designs _a_ and _b_, from the fact that an attempt was apparently made to represent a compound idea in the form of a single combat between two warriors. The figures are quite contiguous to one another. The individual marked _a_ seems to be holding in his right hand a body similar to that represented as _c_, and the position in which it is held would lend color to the belief in its shield-like nature. In the opposite hand are a bundle of rods which have been suggested to be spears, and this explanation for the want of a better may be accepted. On the other hand, we are confronted with the fact that these weapons of offense and defense are held in the wrong hands, unless the holder be regarded as sinistral; otherwise it must be conceived that the warrior’s back is presented to the observer, which is contrary to the other evidence existing in the carving. The opponent, marked as _b_, with legs astride and arms outstretched much in the position of an aboriginal when throwing the boomerang, is equally definitive. I conceive it quite possible that the position of the boomerang close to the right hand conveys the idea that this man has just thrown the missile at the subject of _a_, allowing, of course, for the want of a knowledge of perspective on the part of the aboriginal artist. * * * In several other figures the head is a mere rounded outline, but in _b_ it is presented with a rather bird-like appearance. Another peculiarity is the great angularity given to the kneecap: this is visible both in _a_ and _b_. It is further exemplified in the elbow of the left arms of both _a_ and _b_. SECTION 2.