Ultramarine was also made the subject of a very interesting paper, by Herbert J. L. Rawlins, read before the Society of Chemical Industry, in December 1887. After referring to the native form, lapis lazuli, Rawlins goes on to observe that “analysis could give no clue as to the cause of the blue colour. To prepare it artificially became a great object, and the efforts in this direction were stimulated by the offer of prizes, amongst which was one of 6000 francs, offered by the ‘Société d’Encouragement’ of France, to be awarded to the discoverer of a method of making ultramarine, provided it did not cost more than 90_s._ per lb. How strange it seems to think of this in these days when the value has fallen to less than half that price per cwt.! “As early as 1814, two German chemists, Tessärt and Kuhlmann, had observed the formation of a blue product in soda kilns and calcination kilns, but Guimet, in 1828, first discovered how it was produced, and gained the 6000 francs prize. He did not, however, publish his method, and grew immensely rich, although the price sank to about 16_s._ per lb. In 1828 he was producing at the rate of 120,000 lb. annually. “About the same time, or, as is positively asserted by some, even prior to Guimet, Gmelin made the same discovery and published his researches in full, thus perhaps laying the foundation stone of the present supremacy of Germany in this manufacture. “In spite of the valuable discoveries of Hoffmann, Unger, and others, our knowledge of the chemical constitution of ultramarine is very limited and uncertain, many different theories having been advanced regarding the cause of the blue colour. “According to Wilkins, ultramarine is composed of two portions, one of which consists of two silicates of alumina with sulphite and sulphide of sodium, and is constant in its composition; the other being a mixture of variable quantities of sand, clay and oxide of iron, with sulphuric acid. The blue colouring principle he considers to be a compound of sodium sulphite and sulphide. Another ingenious theorist, Stein, in two papers published in the _Jahresberichte_ in 1871 and 1872, concludes that blue ultramarine contains sulphurous, and not thiosulphuric acid, that neither sulphites nor thiosulphates are necessary to its composition, and that it owes its colour to the presence of black sulphide of sodium, which is formed at high temperatures by the action of sulphide of sodium on alumina--admitting, therefore, that it is not a chemical compound, but merely a mechanical mixture, the blue colour of which is due to the bodies composing it. “Brunner considers ultramarine to be a compound of aluminium silicate, with sodium sulphate and sulphide; while Brünlin regards it as a double silicate of aluminium and sodium, in combination with pentasulphide of sodium. Green ultramarine he considers to be the same double silicate in combination with bisulphide of sodium.