First, one must endeavour to separate the tons and the stones—the Saxon
settlements or towns and the places named from stones set for boundaries
or for marks where manor courts or motes were held. And this is not
always easy, since mediæval spelling was vague, and in some cases an
original “stone” has become “ton” in later years, or _vice versa_.
Generally, a reference to the earliest forms (where such can be found in
Saxon or Norman, or even Early English documents) will settle the point.
Thus Folkestone is by some identified with the site of the “stone of
inscription on the Gallic sea,” mentioned by Nennius, the Saxon
geographer. It is Folcesstane in the _Saxon Chronicle_, and Falchestan
in Domesday, and therefore no explanation involving ton need be
entertained. Keston, again, is Cystaninga, hence in Saxon charters
between 862 and 966, as being or having a boundary mark stone. It is
Chestan in Domesday. But Chiddingstone should probably lose its final e
and derive from a Saxon patronymic, although a modern and grotesque
suggestion is that the dolmen there was used as a Chiding or judgment
stone by Celtic or Saxon priests. Maidstone, again, should probably be
Maidston, being Medwegston in the _Saxon Chronicle_, and almost
certainly meaning the town on the Medway; although it is fair to say
that an ending in stane is early found. Tilmanstone was earlier
Telmeston, and Elmstone was Elmerston, and the earlier spellings of
Goodnestone are Goodwinston, Gudewynston, and Goodneston.
Stones are much fewer than “tons,” although no doubt the number of such
marks (origin of our milestones) was increased by the Romans. Thus the
place Stone, two miles west of Faversham and on their great main road
Watling Street, is thought to mark the site of their military station of
Durolevo, and thus to be named from the distance mark. We must also note
that stone bridges were practically unknown to the Saxons, except those
the Romans had left, and Stone Cross would not appear as a place-name
until after their conversion, while a stone house, except as the castle
of a Norman noble, would be of quite late date.
As to the Tons, some are named from geographical position, such as
Norton (Northtown), near Faversham, and the Suttons (South-town), on the
edge of the Weald or south of Dartford; and, whatever may be the case
with others, the Milton near Sittingbourne is called Middeltuna in the
_Saxon Chronicle_ and in Domesday, since it was reckoned the central
town of Kent when Watling Street was far the greatest and most
frequented route to be considered, being 42 miles from London and 31
from Dover. Our various Boughtons are “settlements in the wood,” as are
also the Woottons. Monkton and the Prestons were settlements of monks
and of colleges of priests.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account