City planning -- Illinois -- Chicago -- History -- 20th century
Chapter 194 of the Acts of the Virginia General Assembly for the
session of the year 1906 provides as follows:
“Any city or town of this Commonwealth may acquire by purchase, gift
or condemnation property adjoining its parks, or plats on which its
monuments are located, or other property used for public purposes, or
in the vicinity of such parks, plats or property, which is used and
maintained in such a manner as to impair the beauty, usefulness or
efficiency of such parks, plats or public property, and may likewise
acquire property adjacent to any street, the topography of which,
from its proximity thereto, impairs the convenient use of such
street, or renders impracticable, without extraordinary expense,
the improvement of the same, and the city or town so acquiring any
such property may subsequently dispose of the property so acquired,
making limitations as to the uses thereof, which will protect the
beauty, usefulness, efficiency, or convenience of such parks, plats
or property.”
CONGESTED AREAS
In considering a model plan for the city of Chicago, attention is
naturally called to the example of European cities which have removed
the inhabitants from whole areas where the population was congested
or the arrangement of the streets unwholesome, and have transplanted
them to new territory while the condemned area was being renovated
or rebuilt. The Plan of Chicago does not contemplate any imitation
of such examples. The police power is adequate to the destruction,
without recompense, of single buildings which are insanitary or unsafe;
but the legislature of Illinois has not yet undertaken to go further
and license the condemnation by municipal authorities of congested or
unwholesome areas under the power of eminent domain. Local drainage
districts may be organized, with power to reclaim wet agricultural
lands and locate ditches over private property, on the payment of
proper compensation; and it would also doubtless be competent for the
legislature to sanction the taking by eminent domain of a district even
within the city which was by nature low or pestilent, as was done with
the Back Bay flats in Boston. Different considerations, however, apply
to an area where the noxious conditions are due to the arrangement of
streets or to the manner of building upon land by individual owners.
Each proprietor might with reason demand the right to be dealt with
individually; and if his own lot was vacant, or was improved with
buildings transgressing no sanitary laws or regulations, he might well
oppose any scheme which required him to part with his land on account
of the transgression of his neighbors. A tract of land fit to breed
pestilence because of the niggardliness of nature might be reclaimed
under the power of eminent domain, because the arch offender was not
subject to the police jurisdiction of the state; but if a plague spot
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account