Great Britain -- History; Theater -- Great Britain -- History; Theater -- Moral and ethical aspects; Theater -- Religious aspects
One of the worst counts against Dramatic Art (as well as against
Pictorial) was the simple fact that it came from Italy. We must fairly
put ourselves into the position of an honest Englishman of the
seventeenth century before we can appreciate the huge _præjudicium_ which
must needs have arisen in his mind against anything which could claim a
Transalpine parentage. Italy was then not merely the stronghold of
Popery. That in itself would have been a fair reason for others beside
Puritans saying, ‘If the root be corrupt, the fruit will be also: any
expression of Italian thought and feeling must be probably unwholesome
while her vitals are being eaten out by an abominable falsehood, only
half believed by the masses, and not believed at all by the higher
classes, even those of the priesthood; but only kept up for their private
aggrandisement.’ But there was more than hypothesis in favour of the men
who might say this; there was universal, notorious, shocking fact. It
was a fact that Italy was the centre where sins were invented worthy of
the doom of the Cities of the Plain, and from whence they spread to all
nations who had connection with her. We dare give no proof of this
assertion. The Italian morals and the Italian lighter literature of the
sixteenth and of the beginning of the seventeenth century were such, that
one is almost ashamed to confess that one has looked into them, although
the painful task is absolutely necessary for one who wishes to understand
either the European society of the time or the Puritan hatred of the
drama. _Non ragionam di lor: ma guarda è passa_.
It is equally a fact that these vices were imported into England by the
young men who, under pretence of learning the Italian polish, travelled
to Italy. From the days of Gabriel Harvey and Lord Oxford, about the
middle of Elizabeth’s reign, this foul tide had begun to set toward
England, gaining an additional coarseness and frivolity in passing
through the French Court (then an utter Gehenna) in its course
hitherward; till, to judge by Marston’s ‘Satires,’ certain members of the
higher classes had, by the beginning of James’s reign, learnt nearly all
which the Italians had to teach them. Marston writes in a rage, it is
true; foaming, stamping, and vapouring too much to escape the suspicion
of exaggeration; yet he dared not have published the things which he
does, had he not fair ground for some at least of his assertions. And
Marston, be it remembered, was no Puritan, but a playwright, and Ben
Jonson’s friend.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account