If the BIRTH OF FLATTERY offer no moral, as an appendage to the fable,
it is hoped, that nothing of an immoral, nothing of improper tendency
will be imputed to a piece of poetical playfulness; in fact, genuine
praise, like all other species of truth, is known by its bearing full
investigation: it is what the giver is happy that he can justly bestow,
and the receiver conscious that he may boldly accept; but adulation must
ever be afraid of enquiry, and must, in proportion to their degrees of
moral sensibility,
Be shame “to him that gives and him that takes.”
The verses in p. 211, want a title, nor does the motto, although it gave
occasion to them, altogether express the sense of the writer, who meant
to observe that some of our best acquisitions, and some of our nobler
conquests are rendered ineffectual, by the passing away of opportunity
and the changes made by time; an argument that such acquirements and
moral habits are reserved for a state of being, in which they may have
the uses here denied them.
In the story of SIR EUSTACE GREY, an attempt is made to describe the
wanderings of a mind first irritated by the consequences of error and
misfortune, and afterwards soothed by a species of enthusiastic
conversion, still keeping him insane: a task very difficult, and if the
presumption of the attempt may find pardon, it will not be refused to
the failure of the poet. It is said of our Shakespeare, respecting
madness:
“In that circle none dare walk but he:”--
yet be it granted to one, who dares not to pass the boundary fixed for
common minds, at least to step near to the tremendous verge and form
some idea of the terrors that are stalking in the interdicted space.
“When first I had written AARON, or THE GIPSEY; I had no unfavourable
opinion of it; and had I been collecting my verses at that time for
publication, I should certainly have included this tale. Nine years have
since elapsed, and I continue to judge the same of it, thus literally
obeying one of the directions given by the prudence of criticism to the
eagerness of the poet: but how far I may have conformed to rules of
more importance, must be left to the less partial judgement of the
readers.
The concluding poem, intitled WOMAN!, was written at the time when the
quotation from Mr. LEDYARD was first made public; the expression has
since become hackneyed; but the sentiment is congenial with our
feelings, and though somewhat amplified in these verses, it is hoped
they are not so far extended as to become tedious.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account