The substantial conception of work (energy) is by no means a necessary
one. And it is far from true that the problem is solved with the
recognition of the need of such a conception. Rather let us see how
Mayer gradually endeavored to satisfy that need. He first regards
quantity of motion, or momentum, _mv_, as the equivalent of work, and
did not light, until later, on the notion of living force (_mv²/2_). In
the province of electricity he was unable to assign the expression which
is the equivalent of work. This was done later by Helmholtz. The formal
need, therefore, is _first_ present, and our conception of nature is
subsequently gradually _adapted_ to it.
The laying bare of the experimental, logical, and formal root of the
present principle of energy will perhaps contribute much to the removal
of the mysticism which still clings to this principle. With respect to
our formal need of a very simple, palpable, substantial conception of
the processes in our environment, it remains an open question how far
nature corresponds to that need, or how far we can satisfy it. In one
phase of the preceding discussions it would seem as if the substantial
notion of the principle of energy, like Black's material conception of
heat, has its natural limits in facts, beyond which it can only be
artificially adhered to.
FOOTNOTES:
[Footnote 39: Published in Vol. 5, No. I, of _The Monist_, October,
1894, being in part a re-elaboration of the treatise _Ueber die
Erhaltung der Arbeit_, Prague, 1872.]
[Footnote 40: _On Matter, Living Force, and Heat_, Joule:
_Scientific Papers_, London, 1884, I, p. 265.]
[Footnote 41: "Atqui hoc si sit, globorum series sive corona eundem
situm cum priore habebit, eademque de causa octo globi sinistri
ponderosiores erunt sex dextris, ideoque rursus octo illi
descendent, sex illi ascendent, istique globi ex sese _continuum et
aeternum motum efficient, quod est falsum_."]
[Footnote 42: "A igitur, (si ullo modo per naturam fieri possit)
locum sibi tributum non servato, ac delabatur in _D_; quibus positis
aqua quae ipsi _A_ succedit eandem ob causam deffluet in _D_, eademque
ab alia istinc expelletur, atque adeo aqua haec (cum ubique eadem
ratio sit) _motum instituet perpetuum, quod absurdum fuerit_."]
[Footnote 43: "Accipio, gradus velocitatis ejusdem mobilis super
diversas planorum inclinationes acquisitos tunc esse aequales, cum
eorundum planorum elevationes aequales sint."]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account