Portuguese literatureBell, Aubrey F. G. (Aubrey Fitz Gerald)
History
Portuguese literature
Bell, Aubrey F. G. (Aubrey Fitz Gerald)
Portuguese literature -- History and criticism
In the fourteenth century most Spaniards
read, a few wrote[129] Portuguese lyrics; and there seems to be no
reason why we should rigorously confine them to the reading of verse,
to the exclusion of Portuguese prose. There is no means of deciding
with certainty whether López de Ayala and Ferrus read _Amadis_ in
Spanish or in Portuguese, but there are inherent probabilities in
favour of Portuguese. No one without a thesis to support would deny
that, generally, the cycle of the Round Table, to which _Amadis_ is
so closely related, was more congenial to the Portuguese than to
the Spanish temperament, that the geographical position of Portugal
facilitated its introduction, and that, in the particular case of
_Amadis_, the style and subject of the work, certainly of the first
three books, are Portuguese rather than Spanish. Melancholy incidents,
sentimental phrases and tears occur on nearly every page. Some critics
even discern traces of Portuguese in the language.[130]
But if we admit that _Amadis_ was written _c._ 1350, who was its
author? It is noteworthy that while in Spanish it had been attributed
to many persons, in Portugal tradition has persistently hovered round
the name of Lobeira. Unfortunately the Lobeira authorship has given
far more trouble than that of prince, Jew, or saint in Spain. Zurara,
basing his statement on an earlier fifteenth-century authority,
in a perfectly genuine passage of his _Cronica do Conde D. Pedro
de Meneses_,[131] written in the middle of the fifteenth century,
ascribes _Amadis_ to Vasco de Lobeira. In the next century Dr. João
de Barros[132] (not the historian) and Leite Ferreira agree with
Zurara.[133] There was no reason why they should say Vasco rather
than Pedro or João. According to Nunez de Leam, Vasco de Lobeira was
knighted on the field of Aljubarrota (1385), according to Fernam Lopez
he was already a knight in 1383.[134] If he was not a young but an old
knight at Aljubarrota, it is just possible that he wrote the book
thirty-five years earlier, in the same way that the historian Barros
wrote _Clarimundo_ in his youth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account