Postal service -- United States -- Second-class matter
“‘The fact is,’ said the same jobber gentleman, ‘that the
United States Government cannot carry merchandise by parcels
post without having to meet an enormous annual deficit for
conducting the service.’ The fact is that the fact isn’t. What
brazen effrontery to declare that the government would lose
money carrying packages at a cent a pound, when the German
government makes money by carrying packages at a little more
than half a cent a pound! It is true that German rates are based
upon distance, but it is also true that Germany, without any
mail monopoly, competes with all comers and beats them out with
low tariffs. The German government can compete with the German
express companies because the German parcels post will accept
packages up to a weight limit of 110³⁄₁₀ pounds, while our
Government turns over to the express companies everything that
weighs more than four pounds.
“Furthermore, if the carrying of packages is such a hazardous
business that our Government should not dare to attempt it,
how comes it that the express companies have become rich at
it? The combined capital of the express companies is a little
in excess of $48,000,000. For years, the big stockholders in
express companies have been apoplectic with wealth. All of this
money came from somewhere. All of this money came from those
who consumed products sent by express. Only a few weeks ago the
Interstate Commerce Commission brought out the fact that the
Adams Express Company’s business in New England yielded a profit,
in 1909, of 45 per cent, upon the investment. Yet, there was
nothing brought out in the proceedings to show, that the Adams
Express Company was gouging New England any harder than it was
the rest of the country, or that the other express companies were
not doing to the rest of the country approximately what the Adams
was doing to New England. If you had the Government’s equipment
for handling express matter, would you feel particularly
frightened at a proposition to give you a monopoly of the
‘packet’ business at an average rate almost twice that of the
German Government’s average rate?”
Knowing that my readers have not wearied of Mr. Benson, I shall presume
to take further liberties with his articles on our subject. His handling
of the point I have raised--railroad control of the express companies--is
so informative and so able that I would do neither my readers nor my
subject justice were I not to quote him and do it right here:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account