Mr. Hitchcock _talked_, so it is alleged, that it would produce $6,000,000 or more, thus removing that “deficit” he has had in his brain or on his mind. Some of the best qualified men in this country have shown, _and they have used Mr. Hitchcock’s own figures in doing so_, that the increased mail rate as this “rider” provided would not produce over $2,000,000 additional revenue, probably not over $1,000,000, after paying for the added clerical and inspection service which such a _discriminating classification_ would require. The reader will note (line 18 of the “rider”), that “newspapers” are exempted from the increased tax. The reader should likewise note that under both this “rider” and the present law, newspapers are carried _free_ to addresses inside the county of publication, save to addressees resident of towns and cities having carrier delivery. By this is meant that this tricky rider, as will be readily seen, leaves the present law--_the one-cent a pound rate_--in force and applying to all “newspapers.” Just here I want to ask the thoughtful reader a question or two, though they are somewhat tangential to the direct line of thought we are at this point following: If such a breach of constitutional law, of the legislative rules governing Congress and of plain, common and understood justice as was covered in this, I believe, studiedly discriminating “rider” on the postoffice appropriation bill--if such a breach was permitted, I ask, how long would it be, do you think, before our newspapers would be made victims of similar restrictions and injustices? In short, how long do you think it would take the gang of conspirators (the “influenced” and the “influencing” factors in the personnel of the conspiracy) who tried to “put over” that rider, to make any nincompoop of a politician who chances to be, or who may become, Postmaster General a _censor of all periodical literature_, newspapers as well as magazines, _published in this country_? In this connection another thought comes which I desire to pass on to the reader. If such censorship is permitted, such discriminating, _abrogative_ legislation is tolerated, how long will it be, think you, before our “banking interests,” our “steel interests,” our “packing interests,” our “hide and leather interests,” our “rail transportation interests” go into the periodical business? Each of these have the country covered--yes, flooded--with agents. No trouble whatsoever for them to get the postal department’s required “bona fide” subscription list and thus be “entered” _at the one-cent second-class rate_. “Will they carry advertising?” Later, yes. _When our children are paying the cost of our blunder they will be advertising each other and--at the one-cent a pound rate._ Think it over and--well, wake up. If necessary, get _cogently brisk_ with that Senator or Congressman of yours. At least, let him know that you are on the job as well as he and that you _understand the job as well as he_.