Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples — John Shaqi
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
To describe the period of 24 hours, regarded as a single unit for
purposes of calculation, most modern and also the ancient tongues
employ the term that denotes its light part, i. e. ‘day’ etc.
Primitive peoples have no term to express this idea and must describe
the period by means of expressions equivalent to ‘day and night’,
e. g. ‘sun-darkness’ (Malay Archipelago)[2], ‘light and darkness’
(Yukaghir in N. E. Asia)[3]. The day is sometimes described by the
concrete phenomenon which it brings, namely the sun. The Bontoc
Igorot of north Luzon have the same word for sun as for day, _a-qu_,
and the time is reckoned in suns[4]. The Comanche Indians reckon the
days in ‘suns’[5], and in an Indian hieroglyph from the northern
shores of Lake Superior the duration of a three days’ journey
described is expressed by three circles, i. e. three suns[6]. The
western tribe of the Torres Straits reckons time in ‘suns’, i. e.
days[7]. We may compare the well-known primitive idea that the sun
originates afresh for every new day. The same thing is found in the
language of signs. La Billardière in the year 1800 relates of the
very low Tasmanians, now long since extinct, that they had some idea
of regulating time by the apparent motion of the sun. In order to
inform him that they would make a journey in two days, they indicated
with their hands the diurnal motion of the sun and expressed the
number two by as many of their fingers. This, he asserts, is the only
reference that can be found to any knowledge of the movements of the
heavenly bodies[8]. So also according to Homfray the natives of the
Andamans describe a day by making a circle with the right arm, i. e.
a revolution of the sun. We may compare the indication of the time
of day by pointing with the hand to the position of the sun, with
which we shall shortly have to deal. It is not improbable that the
designation of the day by means of an indication of the course of the
sun arose in the first place from the indication of the position of
that planet. The same method of expression is found in the classical
languages as a poetic or hierarchical archaism[9], and also in
medieval Latin. But ἥλιος, _sol_, is also used to denote the yearly
revolution of the sun, i. e. a year, and the year is denoted by φάος,
_lux_. Still more striking and more significant for the discontinuous
method of reckoning is the Homeric use of ἠώς, ‘dawn’, instead of
day, e. g. “this is the twelfth dawn since I came to Ilion”,[10]
“this is the twelfth dawn he lies so”,[11] and elsewhere. Aratus
follows the Homeric use[12]. The nature of this _pars pro toto_
reckoning will be further explained in the chapter dealing with the
year.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account