Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
An obviously isolated method is the determination of the times of day
from the daily twice-recurring ebb and flow of the tides; the method
is also very unsuitable, since the period of a complete tide is 12
hours 25 minutes, so that the two periods together exceed the day by
nearly an hour. In fact the Eskimos of Greenland are the only people
who reckon by the tides. They divide up the day according to ebb and
flow, although they must always reckon differently on account of the
variations of the moon[156]. Dalsager[157] also points this out and
remarks that their reckoning cannot last for two consecutive days, so
that they have to make a fresh division every day. The rudiments of
this method are however seen among some of the tribes of Polynesia.
Immediately after the above-quoted divisions of the day among the
Society Islanders are mentioned “the longer periods before noon and
midnight during which the sea rises, and the others following these,
in which it falls”[158], and “night or the light quite gone, when the
sea begins to flow towards the land, about 11 at night”[159]. The
Hawaiians called the rising of the tide by such names as the rising,
big, full, and surrounding sea; when the water neither rose nor fell
it was called the standing sea; the ebbing sea they spoke of as the
parted, retiring, and defeated sea[160].
The night is the time of complete darkness and rest, and therefore
the frequently mentioned expression, ‘sleeping-time’, corresponds to
night. Seldom is the whole time during which the sun remains below
the horizon to be understood by it. On the Society Islands there
were two expressions for day according to its extension from morning
to evening twilight or from sunrise to sunset[161]. The Hawaiian
judge, Fornander, follows this mode of speech when he distinguishes
five periods of night, (1) about sunset, (2) between sunset and
midnight, (3) midnight, (4) between midnight and sunrise, and (5)
sunrise[162]. For the times between sunset and night-fall and between
night and sunrise there is a rich terminology which has already been
illustrated. During the night itself time-indications are for obvious
reasons scanty. Often the only point distinguished is midnight, e.
g. by the Kiowa[163], the Masai[164], the Shilluk[165]; ‘the silence
of the land’ among the Babwende[166], ‘the back of night’ among
the Hottentots[167], ‘the time of sleep’ among the Hawaiians[168].
Hence arises of itself a threefold division in which the periods of
night before and after midnight are distinguished, as e. g. by the
Hawaiians[169]. The usual method is to start from the day, i. e. the
limit of the day, and then to proceed on both sides in the direction
of midnight, as in the late evening of the Hottentots, which extends
till long after sunset[170], and the ‘not yet early’ and the _tara_
(beginning at dusk and extending till the time of rest) among the
Masai[171], etc. The Tahitians are credited with six divisions of the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account