Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples — John Shaqi
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
From the investigation of the modes of naming and reckoning the day
and its parts it follows for primitive time-reckoning in general
that the time-indications refer to concrete phenomena, and therefore
either they indicate a point of time or, if they are related to
periods, these periods are of different and fluctuating length. They
are accordingly of no use in calculating, they cannot simply be added
together even when a number of such periods together make up the
period of a complete day, i. e. they are fundamentally discontinuous.
When several days are to be counted the _pars pro toto_ method is
used: instead of the whole day a part is counted. Within the day
two phenomena chiefly recur with such unfailing constancy as to be
of use in counting: they are the daily reviving sun and the night or
sleeping-time. The word for sun is often the same as that for day.
Within the day fall a number of occupations which chiefly turn the
attention to its length and varying phenomena, and this is the case
also with the sun itself, for the varying position of the sun in the
heavens affords the most usual mode of indicating the time of day.
For the counting a point of time is best suited, or, which comes to
the same thing, a unit without subdivisions, a blank period. This
is the reason why the counting by ‘sleeps’ or nights predominates.
On the same grounds the quite isolated _pars pro toto_ counting
of the days from the dawns in Homer may be explained. To indicate
the duration of time primitive peoples make use of other means,
derived from their daily business, which have nothing to do with
time-reckoning; in Madagascar ‘rice-cooking’ often means half an
hour, ‘the frying of a locust’ a moment[191]. The Cross River natives
say:--‘The man died in less than the time in which maize is not yet
completely roasted’, i. e. less than about 15 minutes; ‘the time in
which one can cook a handful of vegetables’, i. e. an hour[192]. The
Malays, the Javanese, and the Achenese use the following expressions
for a period of time:--a blink of the eyes (literally), the time
required for chewing a quid of _sirih_ (about 5 minutes), the time
required for cooking a _kay_ of rice (about half an hour), for
cooking a _gantang_ of rice (about an hour and a half), half a day, a
‘sun-dark’, i. e. a complete day and night[193]. The natives of New
Britain (Bismarck Archipelago) measure the time between sunset and
the moon-rise by the smouldering of a torch or the time occupied in
cooking yams, taro, or wild taro. Short divisions of time were also
expressed by comparative terms, e. g. the throwing of a stick for a
short distance, ‘a woman’s crossing’, or the distance a woman would
paddle[194]. Very often duration of time is indicated by reference
to the time needed to traverse a well-known piece of road between
two places. Examples are superfluous. But all these indications of
periods of time are found among more developed peoples: the primitive
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account