Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
peoples pay little or no attention to them.
Both in the case of the day and in that of the other time-units this
clinging to a natural basis long proved a hindrance to a rational
system of time-reckoning, which could only be achieved by breaking
away from natural phenomena. For there are no fixed natural limits
of day, but if morning and evening, or still more clearly sunrise
and sunset, are chosen as the limits, these must change every day
and the days will vary in length. Here the midnight period proved of
assistance, since it facilitated the establishing of a fixed point
of divergence. This was done in Rome, and the practice had its root
in daily life, where in order to indicate the time of occurrence of
events which took place in the night-time the calculation was pushed
forwards on both sides towards midnight, until this became the limit
of divergence. It is however an artificial epoch that must be found
by calculation[195].
In the second place the hour of antiquity is a twelfth part of
the whole time of daylight, and this duodecimal division was also
transferred to the night, which had commonly been divided into four
watches according to the practice borrowed from military life. This
hour therefore varied in length according to the time of the year.
The inconvenience of a varying division of this nature must have
made itself felt in daily life, although in the south it was not so
insupportable as it must have been in the north. It rendered the
construction of the clock difficult, and above all was impracticable
for scientific astronomy. Hence alongside of it appeared even in
antiquity the hour of constant length or the double hour, viz. a
twelfth or a twenty-fourth part respectively of the complete day. The
double hour, notwithstanding Bilfinger’s assertion to the contrary,
arose in Babylon (_kasbu_), and is connected with the duodecimal
division of the zodiac[196]. This hour of constant length was not
generally adopted until very late: the varying hour remained almost
up to the end of the Middle Ages. Our modern hour has only been in
general use since about the 14th century, when it was first spread by
the construction of the striking-clock[197]. Its convenience for the
business of practical life and the construction of the clock together
secured the victory of the hour as 1/24th of the day, originally a
numerical and astronomical division. A condition for its use was the
fusion of day and night into one unit, since as long as these were
kept separate the constant hour could not thrive. Both the complete
day and its regular divisions however only won their way after a very
long time, because men were unwilling to depart from the natural
basis in time-reckoning. The substitution of the artificial for the
natural time-reckoning has also, as far as the day is concerned,
created a rational system of reckoning which has borrowed from the
natural system only one feature, viz. the average length of the
complete day.
CHAPTER II.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account