Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoplesNilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
History
Primitive Time-reckoning: A study in the origins and first development of the art of counting time among the primitive and early culture peoples
Nilsson, Martin P. (Martin Persson)
Chronology
THE SEASONS.
The year is for us a numerical quantity of 365 or 366 days. But we
speak of the year in two senses, first as the calendar year beginning
on New Year’s Day, and secondly as the current year, a period of the
same number of days beginning at one chosen day, as for instance in
giving a person’s age. The word ‘year’ may however also represent the
highest chronological unit even independently of the seasons, as in
the case of the Egyptian shifting year of exactly 365 days, and the
Islamite lunar year of 354. These however are exceptional cases. At
the basis lies the natural year conditioned by the course of the sun
and by the natural phases dependent thereon, which penetrate closely
into the life of man. This connexion has necessitated the agreement
of the numerical year with the sun, whence arises a situation very
inconvenient for reckoning, namely that years of a varying number of
days have to be accepted, since the natural year does not contain a
whole number of days.
The year as a numerical quantity is only the tardily attained summit
of development, and the connexion with the natural year has always
been so strongly felt that, except in certain cases such as the
Egyptian and Islamite years, the chronological year has had to adjust
itself accordingly. Here also we see the point of departure, the
natural phenomena which are in the end dependent upon the course
of the sun, such as the variation between heat and cold, verdure
and snow, rainy season and drought, the blooming and withering of
vegetation, between the different trade-winds or monsoons, between
abundance and scarcity of food. With these and similar concrete
phenomena the time-reckoning is from its origin bound up, and is
at first discontinuous, i. e. it fixes the attention solely on the
phenomena in question, and not on the year as a whole. The fusion
of the various seasons into the circle of the year is arrived at
only by degrees: the year is at first counted by the _pars pro toto_
method. The process is therefore similar to that already found in the
discussion of the day.
It must be granted as a premise to our investigation that when we
speak of ‘seasons’ not only the larger divisions of the year are
to be understood by the word--those which alone of all the natural
epochs of the year are current among us to-day--but also smaller
divisions which might perhaps be called seasonal points; for instance
the times of cherry-blossoming and hop-picking are also seasons.
Such short--often very short--seasons are not distinguished in
any important feature from the longer: the difference only arises
from the longer or shorter duration of the phenomena in question.
The Hidatsa Indians describe any period thus marked by a natural
occurrence, be it long or short, the hot season or the season of
strawberries, by the same word, _kadu_, ‘season’, ‘time’ (of the
occurrence), and the longer seasons include shorter[198].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account