Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
Every element in a form, whether it be a musical form or any other,
is capable of exciting a very intricate and widespread response.
Usually the response is of a minimal order and escapes introspection.
Thus a single note or a uniform colour has for most people hardly any
observable effect beyond its sensory characteristics. When it occurs
along with other elements the form which they together make up may have
striking consequences in emotion and attitude. If we regard this as an
affair of mere summation of effects it may seem impossible that the
effect of the form can be the result of the effects of the elements,
and thus it is natural and easy to invent ultimate properties of
‘forms’ by way of pseudo-explanation. But a little more psychological
insight makes these inventions appear quite unnecessary. The effects
of happenings in the mind rarely add themselves up. Our more intense
experiences are not built up of less intense experiences as a wall is
built up of bricks. The metaphor of addition is utterly misleading.
That of the resolution of forces would be better, but even this does
not adequately represent the behaviour of the mind. The separate
responses which each element in isolation would tend to excite are so
connected with one another that their combination is, for our present
knowledge, incalculable in its effects. Two stimuli which, when
separated by one interval of time or space, would merely cancel one
another, with another interval produce an effect which is far beyond
anything which either alone could produce. And the combined response
when they are suitably arranged may be of quite another kind than that
of either. We may, if we like, think of the effects of impulses at
various intervals of time upon a pendulum, but this metaphor is, as
we have suggested, insufficient. It is over simple. The intricacies
of chemical reactions come nearer to being what we need. The great
quantities of latent energy which may be released by quite slight
changes in conditions suggest better what happens when stimuli are
combined. But even this metaphor incompletely represents the complexity
of the interactions in the nervous system. It is only by conjecture
that its working can as yet be divined. What is certain is chat it is
the most complex and the most sensitive thing of which we know.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account