Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
The nature and source of these stock conventional attitudes is
of great interest. Suggestion is very largely responsible for
them. The normal child under the age of ten is probably free
from them, or at least with him they have no fixity or privileged
standing. But as general reflection develops the place of the
free direct play of experience is taken by the deliberate organisation
of attitudes, a clumsy and crude substitute. ‘Ideas’, as they
are commonly called, arise. A boy’s ‘Idea’ of Friendship or of
Summer or of his Country is not, though the name would seem to
imply it, primarily an intellectual affair. It is rather an attitude,
or set of attitudes, of tendencies to act in certain fashions
rather than others. Now reflection, unless very prolonged and
very arduous, tends to fix the attitude by making us dwell in
it, by _removing us from experience_. In the development
of any attitude there are stages, points of rest, of relatively
greater stability. These, as we dwell in them, become more and
more difficult to pass, and it is not surprising that most people
remain all their lives in various halfway houses.
These stages or levels of emotional adjustment seem, for the
most part, to be fixed not by any special suitability to circumstances,
certainly not to present circumstances, but much more by social
suggestion and by accidents which withdraw us from actual experience,
the one force which might push us further. At present bad literature,
bad art, the cinema, etc., are an influence of the first importance
in fixing immature and actually inapplicable attitudes to most
things. Even the decision as to what constitutes a pretty girl
or a handsome young man, an affair apparently natural and personal
enough, is largely determined by magazine covers and movie stars.
The quite common opinion that the arts have after all very little
effect upon the community shows only that too little attention
is being paid to the effects of bad art.
The losses incurred by these artificial fixations of attitudes
are evident. Through them the average adult is worse, not better
adjusted to the possibilities of his existence than the child.
He is even in the most important things functionally unable to
face facts: do what he will he is only able to face fictions,
fictions projected by his own stock responses.
Against these stock responses the artist’s internal and external
conflicts are fought, and with them the popular writer’s triumphs
are made. Any combination of these general Ideas, hit at the
right level or halting point of development, is, if suitably
advertised, certain of success. Best-sellers in all the arts,
exemplifying as they do the most general levels of attitude development,
are worthy of very close study. No theory of criticism is satisfactory
which is not able to explain their wide appeal and to give clear
reasons why those who disdain them are not necessarily snobs.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account