Principles of literary criticismRichards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Philosophy
Principles of literary criticism
Richards, I. A. (Ivor Armstrong)
Criticism
To return, the claims of reference are by no means easy to adjust
with other claims. An immense extension of our powers of referring
has recently been made. With amazing swiftness Science has opened
out field after field of possible reference. Science is simply
the organisation of references with a view solely to the convenience
and facilitation of reference. It has advanced mainly because
other claims, typically the claims of our religious desires,
have been set aside. For it is no accident that Science and Religion
conflict. They are different principles upon which impulses may
be organised, and the more closely they are examined the more
inevitable is the incompatibility seen to be. Any so-called reconciliation
which is ever effected will involve bestowing the name Religion
upon something utterly different from any of the systematisations
of impulses which it now denotes, for the reason that the belief
elements present would have a different character.
Many attempts have been made to reduce Science to a position
of subjection to some instinct or emotion or desire, to curiosity
for example. A special passion for knowledge for its own sake
has even been invented. But in fact all the passions and all
the instincts, all human needs and desires may _on occasion_
supply the motive force for Science. There is no human activity
which may not on occasion require undistorted reference. The
essential point, however, is that Science is autonomous. The
impulses developed in it are modified only by one another, with
a view to the greatest possible completeness and systematisation,
and for the facilitation of further references. So far as other
considerations distort them they are not yet Science or have
fallen out of it.
To declare Science autonomous is very different from subordinating
all our activities to it. It is merely to assert that so far
as any body of references is undistorted it belongs to Science.
It is not in the least to assert that no references may be distorted
if advantage can thereby be gained. And just as there are innumerable
human activities which require undistorted references if they
are to be satisfied, so there are innumerable other human activities
not less important which equally require distorted references
or, more plainly, _fictions_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account