Principles of Political Economy: Abridged with Critical, Bibliographical, and Explanatory Notes, and a Sketch of the History of Political EconomyMill, John Stuart
PhilosophyPhilosophy
Principles of Political Economy: Abridged with Critical, Bibliographical, and Explanatory Notes, and a Sketch of the History of Political Economy
Mill, John Stuart
Economics
It is but rarely that improvements in the condition of the
laboring-classes do anything more than give a temporary margin, speedily
filled up by an increase of their numbers. Unless, either by their general
improvement in intellectual and moral culture, or at least by raising
their habitual standard of comfortable living, they can be taught to make
a better use of favorable circumstances, nothing permanent can be done for
them; the most promising schemes end only in having a more numerous but
not a happier people. There is no doubt that [the standard] is gradually,
though slowly, rising in the more advanced countries of Western
Europe.(125) Subsistence and employment in England have never increased
more rapidly than in the last forty years, but every census since 1821
showed a smaller proportional increase of population than that of the
period preceding; and the produce of French agriculture and industry is
increasing in a progressive ratio, while the population exhibits, in every
quinquennial census, a smaller proportion of births to the population.
This brings forward the near connection between land-tenures and
population. France is pre-eminently a country of small holdings,
and it is undoubtedly true that the system has checked the
thoughtless increase of numbers. On his few hectares, the French
peasant sees in the size of his farm and the amount of its produce
the limit of subsistence for himself and his family; as in no
other way does he see beforehand the results of any lack of food
from his lack of prudence.(126) From 1790 to 1815 the average
yearly increase of population was 120,000; from 1815 to 1846, the
golden age of French agriculture, 200,000; from 1846 to 1856, when
agriculture was not prosperous, 60,000; from 1856 to 1880 the
increase has been not more than 36,000 yearly. In France the
question shapes itself to the peasant proprietor, How many can be
subsisted by the amount of produce, not on an unlimited area of
land in other parts of the world, but on this particular property
of a small size? While in England there are ten births to six
deaths, in France there are about ten births to every nine
deaths.(127) In no country has the doctrine of Malthus been more
attacked than in France, and yet in no other country has there
been a more marked obedience to its principles in actual practice.
Since the French are practically not at all an emigrating people,
population has strictly adapted itself to subsistence. For the
relative increase of population in France and the United States,
see also the movement of lines indicating the increase of
population in chart No. III (p. 114).
Chapter VIII. Of The Law Of The Increase Of Capital.
§ 1. Means for Saving in the Surplus above Necessaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account