Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1Roscher, Wilhelm
History
Principles of Political Economy, Vol. 1
Roscher, Wilhelm
Economics
Principles, I, ch. 3. Compare his Essays on some unsettled Questions
of Political Economy, No. 3. A still more surprising exaggeration in
_de Augustinis_ Instituzzioni di Economia sociale (Napoli 1837), who
goes so far as to call a person guilty of arson a productive person
because he has produced for himself “the pleasure of destruction”!
More recently, _von Mangoldt_ distinguishes between economic labor
and the labor of culture: the latter is incorporated into the man
himself, the former one employed on the external world, in order to
transform it in a way corresponding to human wants. Viewed from the
stand-point of Political Economy, the latter only is productive.
(Volkswirthschaftslehre, 1865, 26 ff.)
331 We might, indeed, compare original production, that which preceded
all other, to eating; the trades, to digestion; commerce, to the
movements of the several members of the body; personal services to
inspiration, and yet all are equally necessary to the life of the
body! Thus, _Gamilh_ compares agriculture to the root of a tree of
which the service rendered by the state is the top. The growth of
the latter contributes, as well as that of the former, to the
nutrition of the whole, and is far removed from exhausting the tree.
Théorie de l’ E.P., II, 46 ff. “Natural production” would, indeed,
accomplish very little without the legal protection guaranteed by
the state, or without the tools furnished by industry etc. But it
is, besides, in most instances, a distortion of the truth to speak
of productive and unproductive men or classes of men. These
expressions are proper only when applied to individual kinds of
labor. See _Murhard_, Ideen über Nat. Œk., 88 ff. Persons seriously
ill are temporarily unproductive, and children who die early, are
unproductive for their whole life.
332 Not, however, in the case in which the loser estimates the pleasure
of the play higher than the loss.
_ 333 J. B. Say_, Traité, I. ch. 1.
_ 334 v. Cancrin_, Œkonomie der menschlichen Gesellschaften, 1845, 10,
speaks, in this case, of privative production. Among the Socialists,
_Bazard’s_ expression _l’exploitation de l’homme par l’homme_, has
found loud echo; instead of which only _l’exploitation du globe par
l’homme_ should be allowed to obtain. (Exposition de la Doctrine de
St. Simon, 24.) But _von Schröder_ had already warned the world of
“imagined food” which led only to idleness. (F. Schatz- und
Rentkammer, 191, 363.)
335 Therefore, there should not be too many nor too highly salaried
offices. See _Storch_, Nationaleinkommen, 33 ff.
336 See _v. Mangoldt_, Volkswirthschaftslehre, 29 ff.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account