Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 105, September 9, 1893Various
General
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 105, September 9, 1893
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
audience in the auditorium, which then began to clear out, highly
satisfied with the excellent bill of fare provided for them by
Messieurs GATTI, the worthy restaurateurs of the old Adelphi Drama.
* * * * *
AN M. P-ERRUQUIER.--M. CHAUVIN, the theatrical perruquier, the
CLARKSON of the Théâtre Français, has been recently elected Deputy for
St. Denis. He will not neglect his business, but will get up all the
heads of his parliamentary discourses in the afternoon, and be ready
to "get up" the heads of the house of MOLIÈRE in the evening. To
those who oppose him in political matters he is prepared, without any
hair-splitting, to give a regular good wigging all round. Should "our
Mr. CLARKSON" stand for some constituency and be elected, he would of
course appear in the House as the representative of the old Whigs.
* * * * *
HIS TWO RELIGIONS.--Though "Mr. G." is a sound Church-of-England man,
yet has he recently shown himself an uncommonly strict Muzzle-man.
* * * * *
JOHN BULL'S NAVAL VADE MECUM.
(_Prepared for his use by the Authorities at the Admiralty._)
_Question._ Does not England possess the best possible fleet?
_Answer._ Certainly, and always has enjoyed that advantage.
_Q._ But do not the iron-clads comprising this fleet frequently turn
turtle?
_A._ Assuredly. In fact, whenever they have the smallest opportunity.
_Q._ And do not the guns with which the ships are armed occasionally
burst?
_A._ Not only occasionally, but frequently.
_Q._ And are not the commanders of the fleet sometimes guilty of
errors of judgment?
_A._ To be sure, and sometimes these errors of judgment lead to
absolute disaster.
_Q._ And are not the ships considerably undermanned and some of the
companies of inferior material?
_A._ Quite so. In fact, when there is a special strain--man[oe]uvres
on a large scale, or for a kindred reason--crews have to be obtained
from here, there, and everywhere.
_Q._ And is it not quite a question whether some dozen of our
first-rate men-of-war are practically valueless?
_A._ Well, scarcely a question, because it is all but certain that
they are practically valueless.
_Q._ And isn't there bullying in the _Britannia_, and a general laxity
in the training of young officers to take important commands?
_A._ Yes, but this is a matter of small importance, as all naval
officers are merely machines, and have no right to think or act on
their own responsibility.
_Q._ And does not a commander-in-chief sometimes make a grave
and obvious mistake, and do not all his subordinates, knowing the
consequences, implicitly obey him?
_A._ Of course, for this is the rule of the service.
_Q._ And is it not a fact that the navy is in want of the appliances
to repair ships that have suffered damage abroad?
_A._ Assuredly.
_Q._ And is not our officers' acquaintance with the characteristics of
the sea rather indefinite and distinctly limited?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account