Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 147, October 7, 1914Various
History
Punch or the London Charivari, Vol. 147, October 7, 1914
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
From a book of reference:--
"'Berlin Work.' See 'Embroidery.'"
* * * * *
News of a serious character reaches us from _The Toronto Daily Mail_,
which announces in its index of contents:--
"Austrian Fleet Bombards Montenegro's Only Teapot."
Another one of true Britannia metal is being sent to our gallant ally.
* * * * *
Illustration: "FARVER FINKS HE'S GOT A GERMAN SPY. 'E'S SITTIN' ON 'IS
'EAD. 'E'LL NEED 'ELP--MUVVER'S OUT!"
Illustration: "THAT'S THE CHAP--'IM WIVOUT A COLLAR!"
Illustration: "NO!--NOT 'IM--THAT'S FARVER!"
Illustration: "OH, LUMME! YOU'VE MIXED 'EM UP NOW. I DUNNO WHICH IS
WHICH."
* * * * *
Illustration: UNREPORTED CASUALTY TO THE FOOTBALL OF THE 85TH INFANTRY
REGIMENT OF THE ENEMY.
* * * * *
HOW TO BRIGHTEN WARFARE.
The contents of a poster of an esteemed contemporary (I confess that I
got no further than the poster), which announced "Training Eagles to
Fight Airships," have led me to speculate whether something further
might not be achieved in similar directions.
Why, for instance, should not rabbits be trained to upset siege guns?
The innocent and docile character of the creatures would be a valuable
asset in work of this nature. Even if seen--and among grass or
undergrowth on a dark night a rabbit of ordinary intelligence might
reasonably hope to escape detection--their real purpose might be
cleverly masked until it was too late. Leisurely approaching the object
of attack, lulling the suspicions of a dull-witted sentinel or patrol by
stopping now to cull a leaf, now to wash a whisker, the well-trained
rabbit would have no difficulty in creeping to within striking distance.
Then suddenly rushing forward and throwing its whole weight against the
nearest wheel of the cannon it would tilt it from its foundation and
fling it headlong to irretrievable destruction, very likely pinning
several members of the gun company among its ruins.
If it is objected that the strength of an average rabbit would be
unequal to the task, are there not, I would ask, strong rabbits among
rabbits, just as there are strong men among men? None of the rabbits of
my acquaintance could, I admit, overturn a mowing-machine; but then
neither could I myself balance a coach-and-four upon my neck, yet I have
seen men upon the stage who could and did. The first object of the
efficient trainer would be, of course, to select suitable rabbits.
Surely something too might be done with white mice? By gnawing through
the tent ropes of a sleeping enemy--especially on wet and stormy
nights--they would engender a sense of strain and insecurity among our
opponents that could not be without an appreciable influence on their
temper and _moral_ throughout the campaign. The tents of commanding
officers of notoriously choleric nature should be the objects of
persistent attention in this way.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account