Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 98, March 15, 1890Various
General
Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 98, March 15, 1890
Various
English wit and humor -- Periodicals
Mr. RUNCIMAN, in _The Fortnightly_, brings a serious indictment of
plagiarism against Mr. RIDER HAGGARD, which it strikes me he would be
unable to sustain in a Court of Common Sense before MR. PRESIDENT PUNCH,
unless it were first laid down as a fixed principle, that a writer of
fiction must never have recourse to any narrative of facts whereon to
base his Romance.
THE BARON DE BOOK-WORMS.
* * * * *
[Illustration: MAXIMS FOR THE BAR.
No. I.
"When Cross-examining a Lady, treat her with Deference."]
* * * * *
SWEET LAVENDER.--Miss SPRULES, whose "Lavender Farm" in Surrey was
recently visited by a ubiquitous _P. M. Gazetter_, appears to be a real
scenter of attraction. "Does it pay?" asked the Interviewer. And of
course the Lady's answer was, "Scent per scent."
* * * * *
"JUNKETING" IN LONDON.--Last Saturday a grand Devonian Dinner took place
at the Criterion. Of course, only _La Crême de la Crême_ of Devon were
present.
* * * * *
THE "SO-CALLED" NINETEENTH CENTURY FOR THIS MONTH.--"_'Palmer' qui ...
ferat._" Has the gallant Corporal any more to Tel-(el-Kebir)?
* * * * *
FROM "1ST FLAT, COLNEY HATCHWELL."--The song of "_Be Mine_" is a great
success. The song "_Be Minor_" ought to be a greater.
* * * * *
NEW NOVEL, shortly to appear, by a Director of the London and
Westminster Bank, entitled, _Allsopps and Conditions of Men_.
* * * * *
UNGRAMMATICAL BUT QUITE CORRECT.--When a Gentleman asks, at a
book-stall, "Have you a number of _Woman_ here?"
* * * * *
WHAT'S "a bore for coal is fun for us!" Mem. by Shareholder, S. E. Line.
* * * * *
[Illustration: NIL DESPERANDUM.
_Fair Visitor (to Hostess)._ "HOW WONDERFULLY WELL MRS. WILKINSON WEARS!
I DO HOPE I SHALL BE AS GOOD-LOOKING AS THAT AT HER AGE!"
_Fair Hostess._ "SO DO I!"]
* * * * *
THANK GOODNESS!
"Off?" Thank goodness, yes!
Always was--confound it!--
An unsavoury mess,
Foulness reeking round it.
Resurrection pie
Not in it for nastiness.
Dished-up--who knows why?--
With unseemly hastiness.
Of the _chef's_ poor skill,
Feeblest of expedients.
Sure we've had our fill
Of its stale ingredients.
_Toujours perdrix_? Pooh!
That is scarce delightful;
_Toujours_ Irish Stew
Very much more frightful.
Thrice-cooked colewort? Ah!
That no doubt were tedious;
But this hotch-potch? Pah!
Thought of it is hideous.
It has been too long
_Pièce de résistance_;
Take its odour strong
To unsniffing distance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account