* * * * * DE TROP.--The last item of the _menu_, as given in the _World_, of the Royal Wedding Breakfast, after the sweets, was named in plain English,--all the previous dishes being given in French,--"cold roast fowls." But how on earth after four courses and sweets, finishing with "_Patisserie assortie_," could anyone have the conscience--we put it in this way--to ask for and to eat any portion of "cold roast fowls"? * * * * * "THIS IS A GOAK."--The _Weekly Register_, recording the event of a Baronetcy being conferred on the present LORD MAYOR, remarks, "With him we know the honour will be no _barren_ one." Very good, _W. R._ The italics are ours, just to emphasize the pun. * * * * * ESSENCE OF PARLIAMENT. EXTRACTED FROM THE DIARY OF TOBY, M.P. _House of Commons, Monday, July 10._--Glad the sitting's over; often get a little mixed here; never so magnificently as to-night. Reached 9th Clause Home-Rule Bill, which settles question of Irish Representation in Imperial Parliament. When Mr. G. brought in his Bill in 1886, he proposed to exclude Irish Members. Remember very well the cheer that filled the Chamber when that announcement made on introduction of Bill. Those were, as PAT O'BRIEN used to say, "the days of all-night sittings." Irish Members stood in bitter implacable attitude of obstruction. At prospect of clearing them out, giving Great Britain some peace in its own Parliament, the hearts of Members leaped for joy. Seemed at moment as if this bribe would be enough to carry the Bill. Then came time for reflection; chance of reviewing opportunities. JOSEPH'S rapid insight perceived in this arrangement a stab at the Union. In phrase which SQUIRE OF MALWOOD to-night obligingly recalled he had written, "The key of the position is the maintenance of the full representation of Ireland in the Imperial Parliament." Mr. G., profiting by experience, proposes in present Bill to maintain Irish representation in slightly modified number. That would seem to cut ground from under JOSEPH'S clinging feet. What he passionately, persistently demanded in 1886, is conceded in 1893. If he cannot abear other provisions of the Bill, he must surely defend the one that retains Irish Members at Westminster. Must he, indeed? Those who think so, know not JOSEPH. For some men the fence might seem a hopelessly stiff one. JOSEPH takes it as an ordinary item in the day's work. No apology; no retraction; no explanation. Black was black in 1886. He, at risk of severing long friendships, said so, and was right. In 1893 black is white. He, anxious only for the prevalence of truth, says so, and is right again.