This would have been pretty picture for a July night; but anyone could have drawn it. In House of Commons it's as common as pastels on the pavement. JOSEPH went the step further that marks the wide gulf between genius and mediocrity. Having declared that in 1893 he, impelled by irresistible conscience and unfathomable love for his country, would vote against what in 1886 he (subject to same influence) described as the key of the position, JOEY C. turned upon his right hon. friends on the Treasury Bench, and with manly emotion that brought tears to the eyes of the Member for Sark, deplored their inconsistency. "What I like about JOSEPH," said the Member for Sark, "is his thoroughness. On finding himself in this new pit, he might have stopped at the bottom and said nothing till the storm had blown over. Or, thinking that a mean evasion, he might have defended the course he has adopted. Those are the alternatives presented to ordinary mankind: only to JOSEPH comes the idea of standing up and indignantly belabouring Mr. G. and JOHN MORLEY for indulgence in the unpardonable sin of inconsistency!" _Business done._--PRINCE ARTHUR, JOSEPH, SAGE OF QUEEN ANNE'S GATE, and JOHN REDMOND, unite their forces against Government. Mr. G. saved by skin of the teeth and majority of 14. [Illustration: A PARLIAMENTARY BEAR-GARDEN.] _Tuesday._--TIM HEALY is an honest man and a loyal colleague. But we are all weak on some point. Temptation irresistible to TIM is to appropriate other people's rows. To-night's row distinctly and exclusively SEXTON'S. Yet TIM promptly came to the front, and remained there throughout the storm. The one clear impression amidst confusing uproar was that TIM was bobbing on top of the turbulence like a cork on the apex of a water-spout. BRODRICK began it, and while storm raged sat silent, astonished at his own moderation. Had merely remarked that the Irish people were impecunious and garrulous. As an Irishman himself ought to know something on point. SAUNDERSON, another member of a gifted race, explained that, on the whole, he was inclined to regard remark as complimentary. SEXTON, taking a different view, retorted with observation that BRODRICK'S language was grossly impertinent. Chairman, appealed to on point of order, gave a nice ruling. It is now established among Parliamentary precedents that the phrase "grossly impertinent," if addressed to an individual, is rank blasphemy; when applied to a thing 'tis but a choleric word. Committee might usefully have applied itself to consideration of this delicate distinction. "Instead of which," as the magistrate once said, it went about roaring like a famished lion.