Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the futureFournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Philosophy
Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the future
Fournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Civilization; Progress
_Privacy._――The last proviso is important. Civilization not only makes
us more accessible to those we appreciate, but also makes us less
accessible to those of whom we disapprove. An increase in our area
of choice would be of little value if everybody else could choose
to intrude upon us at any time or place. A limitation of social
intercourse to a chosen few, or its total cessation for the time
required for rest and recuperation in a strenuous life is one of the
greatest boons one can desire. The rank and file is more gregarious
than the _élite_ and, as one of the ideals of progress is to raise the
masses towards the level occupied by the _élite_, the extension of
facilities for seclusion is of the essence of progress. Hence commons
and open spaces are provided in and around well-planned cities. Houses
are provided with sound-proof walls, and gardens are protected as much
as possible from “overlooking.” A very modern problem of the same kind
is the protection of wireless listeners from oscillations produced in
neighbouring receiving sets.
_Clothing._――The present generation of civilized humanity justly
prides itself on its sensible style of clothing. Although masculine
clothing contains a number of “vestigial” elements which are absurd
survivals of former necessities, the practice, observed more especially
in Great Britain, of wearing a variety of apparel suited to special
occasions and occupations adds a certain elasticity to fashions which
otherwise are almost comically rigid. If a man wore a wreath of flowers
round his head instead of a hat he would not walk fifty yards in any
London street without being arrested for “insulting behaviour” or
“conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace.” Yet a woman could do
so with impunity if she did it with the necessary air of assurance.
The future of clothing is largely affected by social problems.
Masculine clothing ceased to be demonstrative in Europe shortly after
the French Revolution. While aristocracy flourished, it paraded itself
aggressively in velvet and ruffles and powdered wigs. In modern times
it is bad form to strut and swagger, except on very special occasions.
Good clothing is not aggressively ornate or expensive. Its quality is a
matter of lines and cut and finish. Its preciousness is disguised from
the uninitiated. It is like the sober and almost dingy town houses of
the nobility, whose splendour is only shown to favoured friends and
trusted servants. In 1794 the dress of the “aristo” was a passport to
the guillotine. In later and wiser days it is a disguise to deceive the
tax-collector and the demagogue, and to lull their prying rapacity into
inactivity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account