Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the futureFournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Philosophy
Quo vadimus? : $b Some glimpses of the future
Fournier d'Albe, E. E. (Edmund Edward)
Civilization; Progress
_Labour._――In one of his earliest works, “The Time Machine,” Mr. H. G.
Wells forecasts a development of the labour situation very different
from that of the ordinary socialist Utopia. He figures an arrangement
by which all labour is done underground, and is done by creatures (one
can hardly call them “people”) whose bodies and minds are thoroughly
adapted to their task. The picture seems to be a skit on the Victorian
idea of the “family” upstairs and the servants in the basement, but
a grim and novel touch is added by the information that the workers
actually live on those that dwell in the light, coming up at night to
take them away in their sleep.
Such a solution, though it may draw some justification from the
bee-hive or the ant-heap, is not at all likely to be adopted by the
human race of the future. The essential service of Christianity, the
kernel which will remain after the mythological and dogmatic accretions
have been shed, is to provide mankind with an imagination capable of
conceiving and realizing the sufferings of other people and creatures,
and the will to remedy or obviate them as far as possible. Through
centuries of abuse, neglect and misinterpretation that gift has
gradually worked into the mass of civilized humanity. The humanitarian
ideal is explicit and articulate in France, while in England it is
disguised under such expressions as “decency” and “playing the game,”
or “live and let live.”
That it has not yet remade the world is due mainly to two causes: the
arrogance of those to whom money or social position gives an advantage
over smaller people, and the hatred and mistrust engendered by this
arrogance among the masses.
A workman in a physically fit condition does not object to working. He
sometimes feels the drudgery, boredom, or discomfort of it, but if he
is a skilled craftsman, his pride in his work gives him an interest
and satisfaction which helps him over many hours of toil. What he does
object to is to be driven and bullied by an unsympathetic and perhaps
unjust overseer, who turns out the master on every occasion and lets
him feel his power. He wants and sometimes admires a leader, but he
does not want a slave-driver.
In war, there is the same difference between the “come on” officer and
the “go-on” officer, and the same effect on discipline.
I believe that the co-operation of larger organized masses of men will
not only be required in the future as in the past, but that its scale
will eventually exceed anything yet seen in our history.
The key to the smooth working of such organizations is the spirit in
which the enterprise is undertaken. Let us give two examples, one from
the present day and one from, say, the year 2,000.
(1) A.D. 1925:
(a) Navvies required. Apply Eastern Counties Railway Co.’s Depot....
(b) Eastern Counties Railway Co., Ltd. The 250,000 5% Cumulative
Participating Preference Shares are now offered for public
subscription, payable as follows....
(2) A.D. 2000:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account