Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
And still one other element, mischievous in the extreme, must be added
to the social complex--men who pursued no occupation, but preyed on
black and white alike, as gamblers and tenth-rate politicians, drinking
and swaggering at the bar, always armed with knife and revolver,
shooting negroes now and then for excitement. This class was recruited,
largely, from the descendants of the old overseer and negro-trader of
ante-bellum days. With just enough education to enable them to dazzle
the negro by a political harangue, they were both disliked and feared
by the decent white people. According to the testimony of a Northern
observer,[45] the first duty of the Republican leaders in Louisiana
was “to hang them by the dozen.” And it was just because they were not
crushed out, except so far as the respectable conservative could combat
them, that Louisiana had to endure such a drawn-out purgatory before
she was reconstructed.
Economically the State presented no better view. Louisiana had
suffered particularly from the war, as a part of her soil had been
held by Federal troops through a great part of the conflict, and the
plantations had been drained, in consequence, of a large part of
their labor. Taxable property had been reduced almost two-thirds. The
returning rebel found his plantation in the worst possible state of
repair, or his title subject to dispute under the confiscation laws,
while much had been seized by treasury agents or dishonest speculators.
He turned, in the absence of capital, labor, currency, to the one thing
he knew--the raising of cotton. Even here he had to adjust himself to a
complete change of system from fixed, forced labor to payments at set
times or planting on shares where he was at the mercy of his planter.
It cannot be charged, on the whole, that the planter drove unjust
bargains.[46] If the negro suffered, it was at the hands of the poor,
small farmers, as ignorant as the negro himself. But a blighted crop in
1866 was followed the next year by an almost complete failure, while
the Mississippi exacted the penalty of neglected, broken levees by a
devastating flood. Only in 1868 did the planters obtain an average crop
in the great staples. Grinding necessity, as well as the remorseless
political ostracism, drove the better class into indifference to public
concerns and engrossment in their private affairs. Moreover, ignorant,
unprincipled legislation bred a certain temporary apathy even to their
own interests.
Already the finances of the State were in a sad condition. Back taxes
were in arrears, possibly, as was charged, because the property owners
were organized in opposition to the existing government,[47] but more
probably because they were unable to pay. It did not help the situation
that few filling State positions were tax-payers.[48] By January 19,
1869, only about one-tenth of the amount of the city taxes for the
preceding year had been collected.[49]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account