Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
wanted, and this view was borne out by the negroes themselves. “I
consider myself just as far above coming into company that does not
want me, as they are above my coming into an elevation with them.... I
do not believe that any sensible colored man upon this floor would wish
to be in a private part of a public place without the consent of the
owners of it. It is false; it is wholesale falsehood to say that we
wish to force ourselves upon white people.” But he did insist that they
receive equal accommodation.[152] The former set down the agitation to
a political move to renew the strife.[153]
When the bill had passed both houses, the press took a more aggressive
attitude in an effort to frighten the negroes from any attempt to
claim their rights. “Will any negro, or gang of negroes, attempt to
exercise the privilege it confers?” belligerently asked the _Commercial
Bulletin_. “If they do, it will be at their peril.... He may be able
to obtain a ticket of admission, but no New Orleans audience will ever
permit him to take his seat except in the places allotted for colored
persons.”[154] The _Bee_ declared that if the governor dared to sign
that bill after vetoing the former, “legal means would not be lacking
to set aside this arbitrary law, this outrage to the law of propriety,
and to individual liberty.”[155]
The civil rights bill was backed up by a measure intended to prevent
the intimidation of negroes by punishing the bribery of witnesses or
preventing a witness by force, threat, or intimidation from testifying
in a criminal proceeding.[156] It is striking that a Ku-Klux bill--a
bill “to prevent people from agoing abroad disguised”--was quickly
referred and evidently died in committee.[157] Another effort in the
next session to prevent the carrying of concealed weapons met no better
fate.[158]
A measure allied to the above legislation, but of vastly greater
importance because of its National character, was the ratification of
the Fifteenth Amendment, which was accepted perfunctorily by a vote
of 18 to 3 in the Senate; 59[159] to 9 in the House, 36 Republicans
refusing to vote.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account