Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
The wrangle between the governor and Wickliffe, the auditor of public
accounts, which extended during most of 1869 and up until March of the
new year, resulted in a victory for the former. He accused Wickliffe
of extortion and corruption and had him arrested on several specific
charges. Fourteen indictments for malfeasance to the amount of $1800
were found by the grand jury. While awaiting the trial, the governor
suspended Wickliffe and appointed L. T. Delassize, a wealthy negro,
auditor _ad interim_, installing him by the aid of the metropolitan
police. But Wickliffe, nothing daunted, gave notice through the papers
that he had opened his office at No. 53 Conti Street, “opposite where
the Auditor’s office formerly was,” and warned the public not to pay
taxes or transact any business with the bureau until the auditor could
retake possession of his office.[176] A war of injunctions followed:
a writ from the Seventh District Court prohibited Delassize from
performing his duties on the ground that the governor had no power to
make the appointment; a counter injunction from the Fifth District
Court, March 29, restrained Wickliffe from acting. This conflict in
jurisdiction went before the Supreme Court,[177] but before a decision
could be rendered, two of the criminal cases came up for trial, in
both of which Wickliffe was acquitted, but in the one case the judge
considered it necessary to dismiss the jury with a reprimand.[178] The
remainder of the charges were dismissed by the attorney-general on the
ground that the auditor could not be tried until after impeachment.
Party feeling ran high in the press concerning the controversy, some
Democratic papers coming out emphatically for Wickliffe, due possibly
to mere opposition to the governor.[179] The governor withdrew his
opposition and allowed Wickliffe to resume office. In December the
auditor decided to move his archives at night into the building used
as a state house, but the governor on the 30th had his effects removed
from Mechanics Institute to the sidewalk.[180] But this fact created
no excitement in the city, as the affair seems still to have been
regarded as a petty, personal squabble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account