Reconstruction in Louisiana after 1868 — John Shaqi
Reconstruction in Louisiana after 1868Lonn, Ella
History
Reconstruction in Louisiana after 1868
Lonn, Ella
Louisiana -- Politics and government -- 1865-1950; Reconstruction (U.S. history, 1865-1877) -- Louisiana; Thesis (Ph. D.)
In this shape the matter came before the General Assembly in 1870.
Rumors of impeachment had been rife,[181] and even before the
governor’s message was sent in, a resolution had been adopted by
the House for a joint committee to examine into the affairs of the
auditor’s office and the action of the governor in suspending the
auditor.[182] In the special message promised by the governor in his
annual address, he charged that the auditor’s offenses had seriously
embarrassed the government and rendered it difficult to pay the
interest on the State bonds. He specifically accused him of extortion
against individuals and the charitable institutions of the State,
and of fraud against the Commonwealth and collusion with evil-minded
persons.[183] The special committee of the House, to which the message
was referred, offered on January 31 a resolution of impeachment which
was debated at some length and adopted on the evening of February 1
with but five dissenting votes.[184] The seriousness of the question
sobered the Assembly so that the proceedings were marked throughout
the trial by a dignity and decorum sadly wanting in their other
discussions. Articles of impeachment were ordered prepared and the act
suspending him from office became effective by the prompt concurrence
of the Senate on February 4.[185]
February 3, Wickliffe brought thirty-four distinct counter charges
against Warmoth of violations of the constitution and laws, of
frauds upon the treasury, charges of corruption in levying blackmail
upon citizens, of bribery of witnesses, and numerous other acts of
malfeasance. “In short,” the accusation concludes, “his conduct in this
respect is so notorious that it can be proved that he never signed a
bill of pecuniary benefit to anyone that he did not demand and receive
money or other consideration for his signature.”[186] He summed up the
frauds to the State to the grand total of $800,000 and “untold millions
from forgery.” But the only effect this venting of his spleen had upon
Warmoth’s loyal vassals was to cause an investigation to be made which
enabled Warmoth to go before the people exonerated by an official
inquiry.[187]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account