Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F. A. Sandford: December Term, 1856.United States. Supreme Court
History
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F. A. Sandford: December Term, 1856.
United States. Supreme Court
Scott, Dred, 1809-1858; Slavery -- United States
Produced by Meredith Bach, Linda Cantoni, and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
book was produced from scanned images of public domain
material from the Google Print project.)
[Transcriber's Note: A Table of Contents has been created for the
reader's convenience. Minor, obvious printer errors have been
corrected without note. Other questionable text is marked by a
[Transcriber's Note].]
REPORT
OF
THE DECISION
OF THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES,
AND THE
OPINIONS OF THE JUDGES THEREOF,
IN THE CASE OF
DRED SCOTT
VERSUS
JOHN F.A. SANDFORD.
DECEMBER TERM, 1856.
BY BENJAMIN C. HOWARD,
FROM THE NINETEENTH VOLUME OF HOWARD'S REPORTS.
WASHINGTON:
CORNELIUS WENDELL, PRINTER.
1857.
CONTENTS
Syllabus
Mr. Chief Justice Taney (majority opinion)
Mr. Justice Wayne (concurrence)
Mr. Justice Nelson (concurrence)
Mr. Justice Grier (concurrence)
Mr. Justice Daniel (concurrence)
Mr. Justice Campbell (concurrence)
Mr. Justice Catron (concurrence)
Mr. Justice McLean (dissent)
Mr. Justice Curtis (dissent)
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
DECEMBER TERM, 1856.
DRED SCOTT
VERSUS
JOHN F.A. SANDFORD.
DRED SCOTT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, _v._ JOHN F.A. SANDFORD.
This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit
Court of the United States for the district of Missouri.
It was an action of trespass _vi et armis_ instituted in the
Circuit Court by Scott against Sandford.
Prior to the institution of the present suit, an action was
brought by Scott for his freedom in the Circuit Court of St.
Louis county, (State court,) where there was a verdict and
judgment in his favor. On a writ of error to the Supreme
Court of the State, the judgment below was reversed, and the
case remanded to the Circuit Court, where it was continued
to await the decision of the case now in question.
The declaration of Scott contained three counts: one, that
Sandford had assaulted the plaintiff; one, that he had
assaulted Harriet Scott, his wife; and one, that he had
assaulted Eliza Scott and Lizzie Scott, his children.
Sandford appeared, and filed the following plea:
DRED SCOTT }
_v._ } _Plea to the jurisdiction of the Court._
JOHN F.A. SANFORD. }
APRIL TERM, 1854.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account