Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F. A. Sandford: December Term, 1856.United States. Supreme Court
History
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F. A. Sandford: December Term, 1856.
United States. Supreme Court
Scott, Dred, 1809-1858; Slavery -- United States
It is also equally important to note that, when the Constitution was
framed and adopted, this plan of vesting in the United States, for the
common good, the great tracts of ungranted lands claimed by the
several States, in which so deep an interest was felt, was yet
incomplete. It remained for North Carolina and Georgia to cede their
extensive and valuable claims. These were made, by North Carolina on
the 25th day of February, 1790, and by Georgia on the 24th day of
April, 1802. The terms of these last-mentioned cessions will
hereafter be noticed in another connection; but I observe here that
each of them distinctly shows, upon its face, that they were not only
in execution of the general plan proposed by the Congress of the
Confederation, but of a formed purpose of each of these States,
existing when the assent of their respective people was given to the
Constitution of the United States.
It appears, then, that when the Federal Constitution was framed, and
presented to the people of the several States for their consideration,
the unsettled territory was viewed as justly applicable to the common
benefit, so far as it then had or might attain thereafter a pecuniary
value; and so far as it might become the seat of new States, to be
admitted into the Union upon an equal footing with the original
States. And also that the relations of the United States to that
unsettled territory were of different kinds. The titles of the States
of New York, Virginia, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and South Carolina,
as well of soil as of jurisdiction, had been transferred to the United
States. North Carolina and Georgia had not actually made transfers,
but a confident expectation, founded on their appreciation of the
justice of the general claim, and fully justified by the results, was
entertained, that these cessions would be made. The ordinance of 1787
had made provision for the temporary government of so much of the
territory actually ceded as lay northwest of the river Ohio.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account