Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII — John Shaqi
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIIIHaeckel, Ernst
Science
Report on the Radiolaria Collected by H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-1876, Second Part: Subclass Osculosa; Index: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873-76, Vol. XVIII
Haeckel, Ernst
Radiolaria
The four spines, which we regard therefore as "cortinar spines," exhibit a
twofold kind of central junction. In the simpler case they are united in a
common central point, on which rests the porochora of the central capsule
(_Plagoniscus_ and _Plectaniscus_, Pl. 91, figs. 4, 9). These forms are
nearer to _Cortina_, and may be derived immediately from _Tetraplagia_ and
_Tetraplecta_ by differentiation of the four equal spines. In the other
case the four cortinar spines are separated in pairs, diverging from the
two poles of a short horizontal common "central rod" (_Plagiocarpa_ and
_Periplecta_, Pl. 91, figs. 5, 10). These forms may be compared with the
spicula of some #Beloidea# and derived from _Plagonidium_; but their basal
central rod may be compared again with the basal part of the sagittal ring
of _Cortina_, and this comparison becomes very important in those forms
like _Plagiocarpa procortina_ (Pl. 91, fig. 5). Here the four spines
approach very nearly to those of _Cortina_; the two ventral spines (or
pectoral feet) on the anterior pole of of the middle rod are equal, but
very different from the two dorsal spines, arising from the posterior pole;
the lower odd spine of the latter corresponds to the "caudal foot," the
upper spine to the "apical horn" of _Cortina_ and of the #Cyrtellaria#. The
vertical plane, determined by these two dorsal spines, is the sagittal
plane, and two opposite curved branches which lie in this plane (an upper
arising from the basal part of the apical spine and a lower arising from
the anterior pole of the middle rod) may be regarded as ventral parts of an
incomplete sagittal ring. This interesting form and some other similar
Tetraplagida may be regarded either as beginning #Stephoidea# (_Cortina_,
with incomplete sagittal ring) or as retrograde #Stephoidea# (_Cortina_,
with partly reduced sagittal ring). In every case they seem to indicate the
near relationship between the #Stephoidea# and #Plectoidea#.
Another argument for this close relationship may be found in the position
of the central capsule in the interesting genus _Plagiocarpa_ (Pl. 91, fig.
5). Its basal part (with the porochora) rests upon the common central rod,
its ventral face upon the ventral prolongation of the latter, its dorsal
face upon the apical horn; its axis lies in the sagittal plane. The three
basal spines (the odd caudal and the paired pectoral feet) diverge from its
basal pole downwards in the same manner as in the Cortina, the Zygospyrida
and the Monocyrtida.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account