Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons usedBrowne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Science
Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons used
Browne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Medical jurisprudence -- Great Britain; Poisons; Trials (Murder) -- Great Britain; Trials (Poisoning) -- Great Britain
very near the truth. But as the quantity operated on in this instance
formed only 51 parts out of the 180 of the whole volume of the
contents of the bottle as it was first brought to me, the following
proportion will show how much was contained in the whole. For if 51
parts give 1·43 grains of cyanide of silver, 180 parts will give
5·047 grains of cyanide of silver. This quantity of cyanide of silver
is equivalent to 1·002 grains of real hydrocyanic or prussic acid,
which is equal to 50 grains of the prussic acid of the strength of
the London Pharmacopeia. The determination of the relative quantity
operated on, and the original volume of the contents of the stomach,
was ascertained by measuring, with water, the bottle filled, as near
as possible to remember, to that part in the neck where the contents
originally stood, which was 180½ drachms, and to the mark made by the
file 51½ drachms.
“I may also remark that the contents of the stomach, after
distillation, was still strongly acid, occasioned most probably by the
acid in the beer, and also by the acid which is invariably produced
during the process of digestion.”[13]
During his _examination, Mr. Cooper_ produced the bottles
containing the Prussian blue produced from the stomach and from the
apple-pips—the former dark blue in colour, the latter hardly more
than tinged with it. When placed side by side on the front of the
witness-box the marked contrast caused much excitement in Court.
The _cross-examination_ of this witness by _Mr. Kelly_ was so
important, that though very lengthy it is necessary to give it in
considerable detail.
“Until this case,” said the witness, “I had never examined the
contents of a human stomach where a person had been killed by prussic
acid, or a human stomach containing prussic acid. Respecting the
effect of prussic acid on the stomach and tissues of the body, my
knowledge is only theoretical. Prussic acid, which I have smelt from
its most concentrated to its weakest state, has a peculiar smell; it
affects different persons differently. When I smell it, it affects
spasmodically the back of the throat. But it loses its smell in
combinations. I am not aware what quantity of prussic acid destroys
life. I have no practical knowledge on the subject. The case I am most
familiar with is that of the seven epileptics.
“I began my investigation with the view of seeing if oxalic acid was
present. I recognised the odour of beer more strongly in the contents
of the stomach than anything else. I did not trace the smell of
prussic acid in them, nor feel any spasmodic affection in the throat
in smelling them. I did not come to the conclusion, after trying for
those acids and mercurial poisons, which I did not discover, that
there was prussic acid in the stomach, but I remarked to those present
at that time, ‘Well, if this person has taken poison, it must be
prussic acid.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account