Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons usedBrowne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Science
Reports of Trials for Murder by Poisoning;: by Prussic Acid, Strychnia, Antimony, Arsenic, and Aconita. Including the trials of Tawell, W. Palmer, Dove, Madeline Smith, Dr. Pritchard, Smethurst, and Dr. Lamson, with chemical introduction and notes on the poisons used
Browne, G. Lathom (George Lathom)
Medical jurisprudence -- Great Britain; Poisons; Trials (Murder) -- Great Britain; Trials (Poisoning) -- Great Britain
_By the Court._—“I saw nothing on the brain to indicate death by
apoplexy. If a sudden emotion had caused death I don’t think I could
have told that by the brain.”
Mr. Pickering, who had been in practice as a surgeon for nine years,
and was present when Mr. Champneys made the first incision through the
integuments, said he then smelt the odour of prussic acid,[15] and
confirmed the accounts of the previous witnesses of the experiments in
Mr. Cooper’s laboratory. On _cross-examination_ he admitted that before
they examined the body they were led to suppose that the death had
been caused by poison, and that he had never seen a case of death from
poisoning either by oxalic or prussic acid.
Previous visits of Tawell to Mrs. Hart, were proved by _Kesiah
Harding_, a washerwoman at Slough, in December, 1844, and particularly
on the Monday week before her death, when he told the deceased that he
wished her to be alone when he next came, and that he would come on the
Tuesday or Saturday week.
PURCHASE OF PRUSSIC ACID BY TAWELL.
This was proved by _Henry Thomas_, shopman to a Mr. Hughes, a chemist
in Bishopsgate Street, who said,
“On the 1st of January, between twelve and two the prisoner came to
the shop dressed in a great coat and usual quaker garb and asked for
two drachms of Scheele’s Prussic Acid, bringing with him a ½oz.
bottle with a regular label of Scheele’s Acid on it. As I could
not get the stopper out, I gave it him in one of our own bottles.
When about to put on a label, I believe the prisoner said “You need
not,” but I would not swear it. He said he wanted it for an external
application to varicose veins, paid 4_d._ for it, which was entered in
the book now produced. Next day he came again between ten and two and
asked for the same quantity, and, as he had broken our bottle, took it
in the one he had originally brought. I had seen him frequently before
and might have sold him prussic acid, but am not certain. He told me,
three months before, that he had been a chemist and apothecary abroad.
I do not remember his being in a hurry to catch the train and my being
not able to get the stopper out. It is our practice to do it. We
usually cover our bottles with leather. Attended at Aylesbury on the
13th of January, and recognised the prisoner the next morning in gaol.”
The _cross-examination_ of this witness, who was evidently favourable
to the prisoner and in communication with his solicitor, was directed
to three points—the suitability of prussic acid to the disease in the
legs from which the prisoner suffered; the effect of porter on the
odour of prussic acid when mixed with it; and the amount that can be
produced from apple-pips.
“The prisoner,” said the witness, “told me he was suffering from
varicose veins. I judged that he was, from the medicine I sold him.
He rubbed his leg. The prescription now shown me would be a good
external application for the ulceration produced by varicose veins.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account